【Developer Q&A 】2013/09/03

发表于2013 年 9 月 4 日由生活如此傲娇

Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/03/3-9-2013/
来源↗

– according to The_Chieftain, the US rebalance has been postponed from 8.9 till later
根据The_Chieftain（美服开发人员）的说法，美国线的重新平衡从预订的8.9被推迟了

– the Object 268 supposed “nerf leak” is still circulating RU forums, so once again, it’s garbage
268工程即将被砍的消息依然还在毛服流传着，所以我再重申一次，那个是假的。

– Q: “Why do you troll some questions and answers others correctly, it’s not fair!” A: “Want justice? Go to Hague tribunal.”
问：“为什么有时候你的回答是正常的，而有些时候是在婊人？”答：“想要正义吗我的朋友，海牙国际法庭欢迎你！”

– M6A2E1 HT underperforming in regular MM spread? “How terrible…”
M6A2E1重坦（金面包）在常规分房下表现太差了！ “How terrible…”
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/09/02

发表于2013 年 9 月 3 日由生活如此傲娇

Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/02/2-9-2013-2/
来源↗

Today was a bit technical, so I hope I got everything right
今天的东西都是科普向的，我希望我都翻译对了……

– SerB is not afraid of WoWp stealing players from WoT, he thinks the migration will be normal
SerB并不担心战机世界的推出会降低WoT的用户数量，他觉得用户数量的转移是正常的

– SerB describing the difference between US and Soviet penetration methodology: “The difference is in the amount of shell fragments, that make it past the armor. In the common American and German system it is based on “primary penetration” (20 percent of fragments make it behind the armor), while the Soviet data are based on the “guaranteed penetration” (80 percent). We compared the data of German and American 75mm guns tested in USSR and with German 50mm, 88mm and British 57mm. There is a 1,17 times difference on average”
SerB是这么描述美国与苏联之间的穿深计算方法的：“区别就在于能够穿透装甲的弹片的数量。美国和德国的系统是基于“主要穿深”（有20%的弹片穿透了装甲），而苏联的数据是基于“确保穿深”（80%的弹片穿透了装甲）。我们对比了以下一些炮的数据：德国和美国的75mm炮，德国的50mm，88mm以及英国的57mm，在两种计算方法中大约平均有1.17倍的差距”

– SerB states that this table is not accurate, he considers the Soviet gun tests table accurate
SerB说这个表格是不准确的，他认为苏联炮的测试表格是准确的。
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/09/01

发表于2013 年 9 月 2 日由生活如此傲娇

Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/01/1-9-2013/

– as was mentioned before, currently, WoWp average battle time is roughly 4 minutes (which is about half of that of WoT). SerB states that the XP income will be set so that tier 10 can be reached roughly within the same amount of battles as in WoT
前几天也提到过，现在飞机世界的平均战斗时间在4分钟左右（大概是WOT的一半）。SerB表示飞机世界的经验值收入也会调整到一定的程度，以保证在游戏场次与WOT相同的情况下也能拿到10级的飞机

– Taiwanese TD’s in Chinese tree? “Unfortunately, we haven’t found any yet”
中国线里会不会有湾娘的TD？“很不幸，我们没找到任何可以用的东西”

– if you unlock Object 140 in 8.8, you will still have it unlocked when Object 430 comes (SS: but you won’t have 430 unlocked automatically as well)
如果你在8.8中把140工程点亮了，在以后推出430工程以后，它还是会保持被亮的状态（SS：不过430工程不会自动解锁）
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/08/29

发表于2013 年 8 月 30 日由顽童ck

source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/29-8-2013/

– when balancing new vehicles, their use in e-sports is not specifically taken into account
– 当对新车进行平衡时，不会特别考虑它在竞技比赛中的作用

– complete re-work of the camo system (especially to include partial cover) is planned, but it will take long time
– 全面重制隐蔽机制（特别是包含了部分遮蔽）在计划中，但是这要花很长的时间

– Storm: “We continue to give out tanks with garage slots in case of tank switches” and – when asked – specifically on the VK3001H situation, he replied “as always” (SS: other sources also confirmed that yes, you will get free VK3002M, if you have the VK3001H in your garage)
– Storm 说：“如果有坦克替换，我们依旧会发放坦克附带车位。”当问及坦克的替换尤其是 VK3001H 的替换方案时，他回答说与“与往常一样”（SS：其他途径也证实了这条消息是准确的，如果你车库里有 VK3001H，你将免费获得一个 VK3002M）

继续阅读 →

M48 Errata – M48勘误

发表于2013 年 8 月 30 日由顽童ck

Just a quick update: today, I wrote in the Q&A session that M48 might get a buff. I was wrong, I misread one of the questions/answers. At this moment, no M48 buff is planned.

Sorry for that.

SS说: 早前的Q&A里说M48 可能会buff. 结果他错了, 目前木有任何buff M48的计划. 不好意思咯!!!

【Developer Q&A 】2013/08/25

发表于2013 年 8 月 26 日由逍遥龙游

Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/25/25-8-2013/

– it looks like no matter what happens with the KV-1S 122mm gun, the 100mm S-34 will be added either way
– 好像无论 KV-1S 的 122mm 炮如何变动，100mm S-34 都会加入

– the reason for KV-1S balance is that it stands out in the statistics. Not terribly, but it does. So in any case it is necessery to somehow nerf the 122mm KV-1S, but what exactly is still being discussed
– 平衡 KV-1S 的原因是它的战绩太突出了。尽管不是特别严重，但它的确是过强了。所以无论怎样，122mm KV-1S 必须要某种程度上的削弱才行，但是具体如何实施还在讨论中

– the German unhistorical engines removal was the balance team’s idea, not SerB’s.
– 移除德系不符合历史的发动机，这个主意是平衡小组想的，不是Serb

– Q: “Why remove unhistorical German engines when most of the players don’t care about their historicity anyway, but it did cost a lot of XP to level them up and it causes distrust between players and WG?” A: “We don’t care about distrust, conspiracy theorists would make up a conspiracy theory anyway”
– Q：“绝大部分玩家并不在乎那些德系被移除的发动机是否符合历史，既然如此为何还要这么做，我们可是花了一大堆经验去研发它们的，你们不怕这么做会造成玩家和WG之间互相不信任吗？”A:”我们不在乎猜疑，阴谋论者总有办法编出阴谋论”
继续阅读 →

Gamescom Q&A —— 科隆游戏展 Q&A

发表于2013 年 8 月 26 日由逍遥龙游

Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/25/gamescom-qa/

Hello everyone,
大家好

today, we have something interesting. As you probably know, I was not able to go to the Gamescom this year, but others did – in this case it was one player, who wished his nickname to remain anonymous, who met some of the developers and designers and asked some interesting questions. Of course, keep in mind that this is not a 100 percent info I can vouch for, but all of it seems kinda legit to me.
今天的QA有一些有趣的东西。如你所知，我没能参加到今年的科隆游戏展了，但是其他人来了－其中有一位不愿暴露昵称的玩家，见了开发人员并问了一些有意思的问题。当然，要说好我不保证这些信息100%准确，但是我觉得这些看上去都很靠谱。

Here’s what he learned (the way he wrote it, I only corrected some typos):
这就是他搞到的信息（如实照抄，我只改了下拼写错误）

– Japanese are most likely coming in 2013
– 日本线大概在2013年出

– Chieftain and one more other T10 tank may come for the Brits.
– 英国线将加入酋长和另一辆十级坦克

– FV215B likely to be rebalanced – FV215B可能会被重新平衡