Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/02/2-9-2013-2/
来源↗
Today was a bit technical, so I hope I got everything right
今天的东西都是科普向的，我希望我都翻译对了……
– SerB is not afraid of WoWp stealing players from WoT, he thinks the migration will be normal
SerB并不担心战机世界的推出会降低WoT的用户数量，他觉得用户数量的转移是正常的
– SerB describing the difference between US and Soviet penetration methodology: “The difference is in the amount of shell fragments, that make it past the armor. In the common American and German system it is based on “primary penetration” (20 percent of fragments make it behind the armor), while the Soviet data are based on the “guaranteed penetration” (80 percent). We compared the data of German and American 75mm guns tested in USSR and with German 50mm, 88mm and British 57mm. There is a 1,17 times difference on average”
SerB是这么描述美国与苏联之间的穿深计算方法的：“区别就在于能够穿透装甲的弹片的数量。美国和德国的系统是基于“主要穿深”（有20%的弹片穿透了装甲），而苏联的数据是基于“确保穿深”（80%的弹片穿透了装甲）。我们对比了以下一些炮的数据：德国和美国的75mm炮，德国的50mm，88mm以及英国的57mm，在两种计算方法中大约平均有1.17倍的差距”
– SerB states that this table is not accurate, he considers the Soviet gun tests table accurate
SerB说这个表格是不准确的，他认为苏联炮的测试表格是准确的。
– according to the (Soviet) data above, the Ferdinand 88mm gun performed worse than the Soviet D-10T and D-52. SerB and others were wondering why that happened, it was possible the Soviets used very early ammunition model (SS: Flak), in the end, they decided not to nerf the Ferdinand gun based on this
根据上面的（苏联的）数据所述，费迪南的88mm炮的表现比苏联的D-10T和D-52（我看是D-25吧……——译注）差很多（平均穿深都差50mm左右——译注）。SerB已经其他人都很好奇这种现象的原因，有可能是因为苏联人用的是非常早期的弹药模型（SS：高射炮），最后，他们根据这个原因决定不砍费迪南的炮了。
– WG actually started using the German penetration methodology, but switched to the Soviet one during closed WoT beta
WG一开始计算穿深的方法用的是德国的方法，不过在WOT封闭内测期间换成了苏联的那套。
– T-62 won’t appear in WoT, SerB categorically denies the appearance of smoothbore guns (SerB states that the current “armor plays no role” whine would be mild in comparison, as smoothbore guns typically have 400mm+ penetration)
T-62不会出现在WOT中，SerB很坚决的拒绝了滑膛炮的表现数据（SerB表示现在大众的“装甲都TMD是纸糊的！”的抱怨相对于假如滑膛炮引入之后可能已经算不错的了，因为滑膛炮的穿深基本都在400mm以上）
– SerB states that historically the E-75 had neither 120mm sides, nor a 128mm gun, it had 80mm side armor. It was not an improvement of the King Tiger, but its simplification for production. Currently it is not historical in game and if a suitable candidate for its replacement is found, it will be reconsidered (SS: that’s funny, I thought it was actually 120mm)
SerB表示历史上的E-75既没有120mm的侧面装甲，也没有128mm炮，它的侧面只有80mm。它并不是虎王的一个升级版，只不过是虎王的一个简化量产型。现在在游戏中，它的数据是不符合历史的，假如开发团队能够找到合适的替代方案，他们会考虑做些什么的（SS：有意思，我真的以为它的侧面是120mm）
– the final variant of Panther II lower frontal plate was allegedly planned to be 120mm thick, SerB will have a look at it too (SS: probably a typo, the poster most likely means upper frontal plate)
豹2的最终变体版的首下装甲本来是要搞成120mm厚的，SerB也会去看一下数据（SS：我觉得是手滑了吧，原来提问那个人要说的是首上啊……）
– theoretically it would be possible to nerf the D-25T penetration to 165 by introducing early type shells, but it won’t be done… for now
理论上有可能通过引入早期版的炮弹来把D-25T炮的穿深砍到165mm，不过现在应该不会……砍吧。（此炮应用范围：KV-3, IS, KV-4, IS-3, IS-8, ST-I, IS-4——译注）
– SerB agrees with the King Tiger 105mm aim time nerf
SerB对虎王105mm的瞄准时间被砍表示同意
– SerB states that the 8.8 changes in German heavy tanks mobility still made them roughly equal in value to what they were before
SerB表示8.8中德国重坦机动性的改动会让他们和以前在战场中的地位差不多
– SerB sees no reason for rebalancing T-62A/Object 140 in order to make them differ more from one another
SerB找不到一个合适的理由来重新平衡T-62A和140工程，以达到区分它们的目的
– it’s possible the collision model of the Object 140 will change (making it bigger)
140工程的碰撞模型应该会改动（变大）
– historically, the D-5T and S-53 guns were considered sufficient until the King Tiger appeared. But the fact that the 85BM gun appeared shows that the ballistic properties of 52-K were considered inferior to the German 88mm
历史上来说呢，D-5T和S-53炮在虎王出现之前的表现还是很不错的。不过事实上85BM炮的出现表明了52-K的弹道属性比德国人的88mm炮要差一些
– IS-7 will not be made more mobile
IS-7不会得到机动性上的加强
– animated tail gunner will be implemented into WoWp
战机世界的尾部机枪手的动画会得到引入的