【Developer Q&A 】2013/09/01

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/01/1-9-2013/

– as was mentioned before, currently, WoWp average battle time is roughly 4 minutes (which is about half of that of WoT). SerB states that the XP income will be set so that tier 10 can be reached roughly within the same amount of battles as in WoT
前几天也提到过,现在飞机世界的平均战斗时间在4分钟左右(大概是WOT的一半)。SerB表示飞机世界的经验值收入也会调整到一定的程度,以保证在游戏场次与WOT相同的情况下也能拿到10级的飞机

– Taiwanese TD’s in Chinese tree? “Unfortunately, we haven’t found any yet”
中国线里会不会有湾娘的TD?“很不幸,我们没找到任何可以用的东西”

– if you unlock Object 140 in 8.8, you will still have it unlocked when Object 430 comes (SS: but you won’t have 430 unlocked automatically as well)
如果你在8.8中把140工程点亮了,在以后推出430工程以后,它还是会保持被亮的状态(SS:不过430工程不会自动解锁)

– Q: “Will Maus characteristics be changed? And please answer without trolling.” A:”……….. (here there was supposed to be the trolling, but you asked for no trolling, so…)”
问:“鼠式的数据什么的会变吗?请不要婊我, 认真回答。”答:“…………………………(本来我是想要在回复里婊你的,不过你说了不要婊你,所以……)” 

– the engine compensation for E50/75 (previously WG firmly said there will be no compensation) was a result of a “little discussion”
E50/75的引擎补偿问题(前面WG明确表示不会有补偿的)的结论是还在“讨论当中”

– SerB on why they buffed already strong tanks: “The strong will become (SS: not stronger, but) more elaborate/advanced, while the weak will recieve additional impulse to become strong”
SerB对为什么他们继续Buff那些已经很强的坦克的问题的回复:“很强的坦克会变得(SS:不是越来越强,但是会)更加的先进,与此同时,很弱的坦克也会得到额外的Buff来变强”

– SerB states that the T15E2 gun penetration is historical, it was only recalculated according to Soviet standards (SS: for those not versed in this: Soviets used different methodology than the Americans or Germans, when it came to calculating penetrating hits. In other words, if a Soviet test ended with 170mm penetration, it does NOT equal an American 170mm test result. Recalculations must be made.)
SerB表示T15E2的炮的穿深是符合历史的,只不过是用毛子的标准又计算了一次(SS:以下是科普:苏联计算穿深的方法和美国,德国都不一样。也就是说,如果苏联的测试结果是170mm的穿深,但是那并不意味着美国的穿深测试结果也是170mm。必须要重新进行计算)

– additionally (regarding the case above), there is no need to point out Hunnicutt results to the developers, they know about his books, SerB states that the method of result recalculation is definitely correct
还有(接上文),没有必要向开发团队指出Hunnicutt这个人的结论(目测作家),他们知道他写的书,SerB表示重新计算结果的计算方法是完全正确的

– T-50-2 was not changed (thrown out) sooner simply because WG didn’t get to do it
T-50-2没有更早的被移除出游戏的原因是WG他们没搞而已(优先级) 

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注