Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/15/15-9-2013/
来源↗ 

Very little today
今天一共三行字…… 

– SerB would like to add destructable/deformable ground to WoT, but so far it is beyond technical possibilities
SerB也想在WOT中加入可摧毁/可变型的地面，但是现在这已经不是技术手段的问题了……

– SerB on Golden Joystick and the wave of negative feedback on it: “Personally, to be honest, I don’t care about it”
SerB对于金摇杆奖[（通过投票选出各大平台的年度最佳游戏，一开始只有PC，后来被推广到各个平台）（2012年坦克世界的奖项是年度大型多人在线游戏）——译注] 的看法：“说实话，我才不管呢。”

– VK3002M having too few hitpoints? “How terrible…”
VK3002M的血太少了？ “How terrible…”

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/14/14-9-2013/
来源↗

– Storm on fixing longer waiting times on RU server: “It is now needed to trace (SS: as in ‘pin down’) existing problems so they can be fixed later”
Storm对何时能够修复毛服单排时间过长的问题：“我们现在要做的就是追踪（SS：也就是确认）现有的问题，便于日后修复”（言外之意：现在不弄，以后再说。）

– Q: “Why are Japanese tankers now so blonde and have names like Emil and Dietrich?” A: “Those are allied kids on an exchange trip” (SS: currently, Japanese crew in Chi Nu Kai
– upcoming 8.9 premium Japanese tank – consists temporarily of German crewmen”
问：“为什么日系的乘员都是金发的纯爷们？”答：“那些是交换生，你有意见么？”（SS：现在，8.9那辆日系的金币车-ChiNu·改里面的成员——是暂时用德国的组员顶包的）
继续阅读 →

Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/13/13-9-2013/
来源↗ 
Firday 13th – a good day for translations 🙂
一个周五十三日，又是翻译好时节（所谓的黑色星期五） 

– according to The_Chieftain, both M36B1 (M4A3 hull with M36 turret) and T53 (not sure what that is) are viable candidates for tier 6 US premium tank destroyer
根据The_Chieftain表示，M36B1（M4A3的车身与M36炮塔的组合体）和T53（不知道这是啥……）（翻译菌注：原帖楼下有人给出了详细的图片，这辆车是基于M4谢尔曼的底盘的，用了一杆90mm的炮。这车没炮塔，敞篷。）都是美国六级金币TD的候选车

– Q: “It is now possible to view the amount of tanks I have in garage in the new stats for my account, why is it not possible for other accounts?” A: “For the same reason we your account status is not shown to everyone you meet” (SS: as in, some privacy protection)
问：“我现在可以看我车库里有的车的新的数据了，但是为什么看不到别人的？”答：“理由是你的账号信息也不是开放给任何人的”（SS：隐私保护政策之类的吧）
继续阅读 →

Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/11-9-2013/
来源↗

– Storm confirms: KwK = tank gun, PaK = anti-tank gun (SS: a lot of people are confused by this designation. While in real life there were often some changes on both guns (for example re-worked breech to fit it on some platform), essentially both versions are roughly equal. In other words: designating a gun PaK and not KwK in the game doesn’t grant it any special properties)
Storm确认了说KwK的意思是坦克用炮，而PaK是反坦克炮（SS：许多人把这两个名字搞混了。当然在现实生活中，这两杆炮都有许多不同的改造版（例如重制了后膛，以便于塞进某些车里）当然本质上这两杆炮是差不多一样的。换句话说：在游戏中一杆炮是PaK而不是KwK并不会对数据有影响）

– it’s highly possible that the rating formula will be reworked, based on feedback
官方的评级公式很有很大可能性基于玩家反馈而重做

– T-34-3 ingame performance evaluation will take “no less than a month” – a couple of weeks for players to get used to it and a couple of weeks to collect the data (SS: after that it is possible it will be buffed/nerfed)
T-34-3在游戏内的表现评估会用“至少一个月”的时间来判断—先给你们几个礼拜，让玩家们熟悉这辆车，然后再用几个礼拜来收集数据（SS：在那之后就会决定这辆车是要砍还是Buff）

– the personal rating now takes into account only average damage per battle regardless of tier (SS: this is not to promote sealclubbing)
评分系统现在只计算场均伤害，而不论你的造成伤害的坦克的平均等级（SS：不是让你去屠幼……）
继续阅读 →

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/10/10-9-2013/
来源↗

This is the regular daily QA thread. There will be one more special QA post after this today.
这是今天的常规QA帖，今天晚些时候还会有一个特别的QA帖出现（翻译菌注：截止发稿时依然没有此特别帖出现的迹象） 

– Storm states that the player opinion “there is less than one arty and one scout per battle on average” is not true according to WG’s statistics
有玩家反映，“现在平均每场火炮和侦查车的数量都低于一辆”（也就是说有的时候没有火炮，有的时候没有侦察车——译注）Storm说，根据WG的数据来看，这个说法不对的

– how much arty in battles on average? “less than Storm would like”
现在平均还有多少火炮依然在战斗中？“比Storm的期望值还低”
继续阅读 →