分类目录归档：Q&A

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/14

发表于由
1

– the 25 percent spread of damage and penetration is not tied to each other (eg. if a max penetration with 25 percent bonus is applied, it does not mean you will deal maximum damage too)
25%的穿深/伤害浮动两者没有联动的关系(比如你穿深某次最大上浮了25%并不意味着你这次伤害也会上浮25%)

– T-34-1 would underperform without the 100mm gun
如果tg的T-34-1木有100炮就会不举

– multicore support “is there for a long time already” (Storm: When the client physics is introduced, the second core will be loaded more)
CPU的多核支持的呼声已经有很长一段时间了(Storm:当客户端物理引擎[Havok]引入后,第二个核就会派上更多的用场）
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/13_感谢R2D2勘误

发表于由
2

– Q: “Why isn’t German multilayered armor modelled in the game?” A: “Because such an armor was in no model of the mentioned nation until the end of 20th century” (SS: a player claimed that the E-100 had multilayered armor based on some scheme that wasn’t sourcelinked)
为啥游戏里元首车辆木有多层装甲?
答:这种科技直到二十世纪末之前都没被德国自己使用（SS:有玩家抱怨说E100是计划有多层装甲来着）:

(图的右半应该是来自某张战后还原的设计图，左半边的首下很明显跟右边不一样，左边的德文里有“新型”前装甲的字样，再经过来源搜索后，这玩艺很可能跟鳄鱼歼击车、虎3之类纯YY模型车一样出自后世空想模型家的手笔) –R2D2

– SerB regarding the same issue: “This question has been answered already, the tank corresponds to our data”
SerB接着上面的问题补充:“这类问题早就说过了,我们wg的资料就是王道,不服你也去找图纸啊”

– Q: “Do the spotting rays… *insert long and ridiculous question about spotting mechanism*” A: “So what do you think, are our programmers complete retards, or will you leave them a chance for a small glimmer of intellect?” (SS: here SerB started raging and trolling – skipped the following stuff)
Q:关于那个点亮侦测线的问题··*关于点亮侦测机制问题一堆又长又荒谬的问题提问
答:所以你怎么想?我们的程序猿完全脑残?或者你会给他们留点口碑么“（SS:SerB开始暴走~ 跳过相关暴走内容）–R2D2勘误

继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/12

发表于由
回复

好吧,开场白向SS致敬-SilentStalker, 由于被揭泄露超测相关信息,这位SS的论坛账号被封了(EU wot bbs)

– flight speed of 183mm Object 261 AP shell and 203mm Object 212 HE shell are nearly identical, that however does not mean their trajectories are automatically the same
炸逼261的180口径的管子喷出的炮弹和炸逼212的203口径喷出的炮弹的飞行速度基本一样的,但这并不意味着它们的弹道也一样

– crew icons and pictures (uniforms) won’t be based on the tank era (eg. Bunderswehr Leopard crew will still be using Wehrmacht uniforms)
坦克手的的徽章和头像和坦克本身关系并不大举例子(比如豹式的坦克手们将会沿用国防军制服）

继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/11

发表于由
回复

嘛~~ 先看看近期女王td的表现吧:


看来183的215b暂时不会nerf了~ 童鞋们赶紧练一个吧….

– Q: “When will SerB stop making a god out of himself?” A: “Already stopped, when I made one out of myself.”
SerB啥时候能不装大婶~?答:当我不装的时候就是我自己了~2333

– SerB states that devs have full right to buff/nerf gift tanks, just like they have principially full right to buff/nerf premium tanks
SerB说dev拥有对礼品车的任意buff/nerf的权利, 就和他们对待金币车一样

– M1932 Christie tank (SS: very fast, theoretically up to 200 km/h) might be introduced one day, but it’s questionable whether the tank really reached such speeds
有一天可能会引入 M1932克里斯蒂坦克(SS:跑的灰常之快理论上能达到200km/h),但它值得怀疑的这货是否真能达到这样的速度，
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/10

发表于由
2

八爪代班施工

– currently, Soviet tier 7 and 8 light tanks are not planned
毛子系的7-8级轻坦的卫星还没造好

– Object 120 will not appear in World of Tanks
Object 120这种东西我们是不会考虑的

– AI controlled tanks? “no comment”
添加电脑AI对手? 免谈

– Clanwars are still considered to be in beta stage, that’s the reason for the often CW breaks因为领土战还在测试阶段，所以可能会经常停用。

继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/9

发表于由
回复

– second American medium branch, turreted British tank destroyers: “no comment”
米国第2条中坦线和带炮塔的女王td？“无可奉告”

– Leopard 1 won’t have its gun stabilizer included directly into its stats, but you will be able to mount it as an equipment
豹1不会自带垂稳装置，不过你可以给它买垂稳配件装

– second US artillery branch based on M1XX designs (M107-M110) – “if necessery”
如果有必要的话，米国第2条炸逼线将基于M1xx设计的（M107-M110酱紫）

继续阅读 →