【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/13_感谢R2D2勘误

– Q: “Why isn’t German multilayered armor modelled in the game?” A: “Because such an armor was in no model of the mentioned nation until the end of 20th century” (SS: a player claimed that the E-100 had multilayered armor based on some scheme that wasn’t sourcelinked)
为啥游戏里元首车辆木有多层装甲?
答:这种科技直到二十世纪末之前都没被德国自己使用(SS:有玩家抱怨说E100是计划有多层装甲来着):

(图的右半应该是来自某张战后还原的设计图,左半边的首下很明显跟右边不一样,左边的德文里有“新型”前装甲的字样,再经过来源搜索后,这玩艺很可能跟鳄鱼歼击车、虎3之类纯YY模型车一样出自后世空想模型家的手笔) –R2D2

– SerB regarding the same issue: “This question has been answered already, the tank corresponds to our data”
SerB接着上面的问题补充:“这类问题早就说过了,我们wg的资料就是王道,不服你也去找图纸啊”

– Q: “Do the spotting rays… *insert long and ridiculous question about spotting mechanism*” A: “So what do you think, are our programmers complete retards, or will you leave them a chance for a small glimmer of intellect?” (SS: here SerB started raging and trolling – skipped the following stuff)
Q:关于那个点亮侦测线的问题··*关于点亮侦测机制问题一堆又长又荒谬的问题提问
答:所以你怎么想?我们的程序猿完全脑残?或者你会给他们留点口碑么“(SS:SerB开始暴走~ 跳过相关暴走内容)–R2D2勘误


– regarding the visibility check rays: “Their calculations are requiring and thus they are done only in limited intervals” (SS: for more details chet wotwiki on how visibility works)
关于可见距离的检测线问题:”他们的计算要求,因此,他们只完成有关详细信息,切特WOT维基上的知名度如何在有限的时间间隔“(SS)

– In 1943, Italians still projected welded hulls. They also bought the license for the Panther, but in the end, they didn’t make a “smaller version” of it, they projected a completely different tank (SS: the P.40 – P.43)
1943年吃馅饼的那帮人还在计划搞焊接车.他们也买了黑豹的生产许可.可最后他们缺没有造出来一个小号黑豹,却造了一个完全不一样的东西(SS: P.40 – P.43)

– the abovementioned tank didn’t copy the Panther solutions (Italian industry technical level didn’t allow that), rather only copied the concept (in P.40-P.43 series) (SS: the player was asking about a P.43 with a welded hull and 105mm native gun, possibly with torsion bar or Christie suspension)
This is how it would have looked: the P.40, P.43, Panther
接上文, 买了许可的馅饼们并没有复制黑豹的流程(出于意大利国工业水平有限)他们只是得到设想(用于P40-P43系列上) (SS:那有玩家询问关于焊接车体并搭载105原生炮的P.43,这货可能有扭杆或者克里斯蒂悬挂的东西怪物)请看下图

– regarding this wooden mock-up: SerB thinks it’s some sort of P.40 ancestor, but isn’t sure:
关于木制伪装模型, SerB觉得某种P.40的雏形,但不确定

– Italian P.43 with new suspension? SerB thinks the variant where they move the P.43 platform to Christie suspension is more likely given the state of Italian industry than some sort of Panther-like suspension
馅饼的P.43有新型悬挂来着? SerB觉得用采用克里斯蒂悬挂的P.43型号,比用黑豹的更能反映当时的馅饼国的工业水准

– there is a chance Churchill AVRE will make an appearance
丘吉尔AVRE[Churchill AVRE (Armoured Vehicle Royal Engineers)]可能会粗线

– the new German medium branch will not come with special new camouflage – it’s not yet decided when new German camo will come
元首的2线mt线不会有的金币涂装,因为到现在还没决定什么时候粗

–  official camo value for vehicles? “No, players would whine ‘why does this tank have more than that’ etc. It’s not on our actual to do list, maybe one day”
有官方的隐蔽属性值么?答: 木有,到时候肯定有一群人抱怨为啥这个比那个更猥琐.暂时不考虑这样的非常规问题 -R2D2勘误

– there will be no special maps for hightier vehicles, maps will be done for everyone
不考虑给高等级车辆专门搞地图

– free XP is awarded based on basic XP gain, the x2/x3/x5 first day wins apparently don’t count (SS: the answer was unclear, can someone confirm?)
全局经验只和基础经验有关, 2倍/3倍/5倍这样的活动显然不计算在内(SS:不清楚,有人能确认下么?)
SS对原问题的理解错了,原问题是有个玩家以为每场的全局经验是当场总经验的10%,所以认为自己的747基础经验在首胜双倍后不应该只有74全局经验(实际上完全正确,因为全局是总经验的5%),然后被光头用可能是毛子黑话之类的嘲讽了
文章评论里已经有人纠正并确认过首胜翻倍之类的额外经验都会计入全局,SS也看到回复了,不知道为啥文章本体却没修改。。。。—–R2D2

– maximum tank display distance (SS: cca 500m) has not been reduced, it will be increased based on technological possibilities
最远能看到坦克的可视距离(SS:大概500米)并没有减少过,今后在技术允许的条件下增加吧

– plans regarding taking the “popular” nicknames from 0-battle “squatting” old accounts? “No comment”
那些占着”非主流”昵称但是不参战的人不打算注销他们么?老子要用! 答:无可奉告

– it can’t be clearly stated whether unlocking the engine or new suspension increases TD maneuverability more, it depends on too many factors
不能说TD的发动机比起履带更能体现机动性能(TD更新履带和花冻鸡的顺序来着
)因为这中间机动关系的参数有很多

– so far, no data has been uncovered from Bovington about the FV100 assault vehicle, rumored to have been projected
完全没有在英国bovington坦克博物馆发现FV1000突击型的资料,可能只是个传说.

– tier 7 medium T-43 is doing fine without the D-10T gun. SerB states, that the Chinese T-34-1 has the 100mm to perform well, while T-43 would be overpowered with it
VII级的苏联T-43没了100mm D-10T的管子也没啥不好的啊. SerB说比起TG的T-34-1有100炮来说还行,但T-43有的话就太ibma了.

【Developer Q&A 】2013/3/13_感谢R2D2勘误》上有2个想法

  1. – Q: “Why isn’t German multilayered armor modelled in the game?” A: “Because such an armor was in no model of the mentioned nation until the end of 20th century” (SS: a player claimed that the E-100 had multilayered armor based on some scheme that wasn’t sourcelinked)
    为啥游戏里元首车辆木有多层装甲?
    答:这种科技直到二十世纪末都没被其他国家使用(SS:有玩家抱怨说E100是计划有多层装甲来着)

    ==== 不是其他国家,是“上述国家(也就是德国)到二十世纪末之前都没有坦克型号使用这种技术。(那张图的右半应该是来自某张战后还原的设计图,左半边的首下很明显跟右边不一样,左边的德文里有“新型”前装甲的字样,再经过来源搜索后,这玩艺很可能跟鳄鱼歼击车、虎3之类纯YY模型车一样出自后世空想模型家的手笔。)

    – Q: “Do the spotting rays… *insert long and ridiculous question about spotting mechanism*” A: “So what do you think, are our programmers complete retards, or will you leave them a chance for a small glimmer of intellect?” (SS: here SerB started raging and trolling – skipped the following stuff)
    Q:关于那个点亮侦测线的问题··*关于点亮侦测机制问题一堆又长又荒谬的问题提问
    答:所以你怎么想?我们的程序猿完全阻碍什么了?或者你会给他们留点口碑么

    ==== 按上下文看“retard”这里应该取英语俚语“白痴 / 弱智 / 脑残”的意思。

    – official camo value for vehicles? “No, players would whine ‘why does this tank have more than that’ etc. It’s not on our actual to do list, maybe one day”
    有官方金币涂装价格清单么?答: 木有,到时候肯定有一群人抱怨为啥这个比那个贵来着.暂时不考虑这样的非常规问题

    ==== 这里的camo value是指车辆隐蔽值。

    – free XP is awarded based on basic XP gain, the x2/x3/x5 first day wins apparently don’t count (SS: the answer was unclear, can someone confirm?)
    全局经验只和基础经验有关, 2倍/3倍/5倍这样的活动显然不计算在内(SS:不清楚,有人能确认下么?)

    ==== SS对原问题的理解错了,原问题是有个玩家以为每场的全局经验是当场总经验的10%,所以认为自己的747基础经验在首胜双倍后不应该只有74全局经验(实际上完全正确,因为全局是总经验的5%),然后被光头用可能是毛子黑话之类的嘲讽了。

    文章评论里已经有人纠正并确认过首胜翻倍之类的额外经验都会计入全局,SS也看到回复了,不知道为啥文章本体却没修改。。。。

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注