【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/27

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/27/27-11-2013/
来源↗

– both the L7 gun and the engine on Type 61 tier 9 Japanese MT are historical according to SerB
SerB说九级日系中坦,61式的L7炮和发动机都是史实的

– regular Type 98 Ke-Ni in game will have Hara suspension (SS: Christie suspension “Otsu” version will possibly be a premium tank)
游戏内常规的九八式軽戦車 ケニ使用的是Hara悬挂系统(SS:使用克里斯蒂悬挂的“乙”式有可能会作为金币车出现)

– Japanese heavy branch is being developed
日系重坦正在开发中
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/26

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/26/26-11-2013/
来源↗

– mods such as XVM or noobmeter have no influence on tank MM (SS: yes, someone really asked that)
例如XVM和noobmeter这样的插件并不会对坦克的MM产生影响(SS:没错,有人真的问了这样的问题……)

– a player asked whether it was possible to make a U-turn with a tank (like drifting) – SerB said sure, to try it with MT-25
有玩家询问是否可能用坦克漂移来进行掉头—SerB表示说可以,用MT-25试试去
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/25

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/
来源↗

Hello everyone,
大家嚎 

please take a few minutes of your time to check the post about the Christmas Charity for a veteran tanker from WW2. Thank you.
请花些时间在看一下这个关于给一位二战的老坦克手的圣诞节筹钱买礼物的帖子。谢谢你。 

Also, if you are interested, check out an article by Listy about the origins of Orlik’s medal
如果你有兴趣的话,顺便看一下Listy的关于奥利克勋章的来源的文章 

– if you enter a battle with premium account activated and it expires during this battle, the income results (which are calculated when the battle is over) will be without premium account bonus
如果你在排进战斗时,VIP还有效,当结束时VIP就过期了的话,你的银币收入(在战斗后结算的)将不会把VIP加成计算在内
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/24

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/24/24-11-2013/
来源↗

Some of you might be interested in the fact that with the current weekend event, WG EU achieved a fail hattrick. First, there was no discount on E-25 (and now it is), then the new 8.9 TD’s were included even though this was not indended and now, they can’t even make the icons for them right. As a bonus, when you click the new TD names, you will not be redirected to the Wargaming site, but to Wotwiki. Sometimes I really wonder whether this is an intentional trolling or not.
你们也许会对这个周末WG欧服的活动很感兴趣。WG欧服这周连错三次的帽子戏法可是非常少见的。首先,E-25一开始没有打折(现在有打折了),然后8.9的新TD线居然包含在了6级/7级TD打折的活动当中,虽然活动上头没写,现在,他们就算把它们加上去之后,连图标都搞不定。另外,如果你点击新TD的名字的话,你不会被重新链接到WoT官网的百科,而是会被链接到WOT的维基百科里。有的时候我真的在想,这是不是WG在公开的婊我们。
(图标如下图) 注意那个犀牛的图标……
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/23

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/23/23-11-2013/
来源↗

So, according to info from iScendig (EU community organizer – thanks to EmperorSafirius for that, at least I hope it was you who told me that on FB), there will be some sort of new QA thread in English on EU forums. Well, a lot of things suddenly make even more sense, don’t they?
从iSceendig那得到的消息来看(此人为欧服社区管理者—还是要谢谢EmperorSafirius ,起码我希望是你在FaceBook上跟我说这个事的)在欧服板块会有全新的英语的QA帖子。恩,许多事情看起来就清楚的多了,是吧? (此处在说明FTR的QA被关掉的事情,起因是欧服的某个版主在向WG总部抱怨他们“偏袒”FTR)

Since this was openly posted on US forums too, I think it’s no longer a secret: Pavel “Zlobny” Myreev, Wargaming’s chief of tank balance left Wargaming recently. I’d like to openly thank him this way for participating in FTR QA and being a very friendly and nice person overall and also for (whatever you might think of the game) doing a good job on balancing the ingame vehicles in the past.
鉴于此事已经在美服上明说了,我也就不认为这是个秘密了:Pavel “Zlobny” Myreev,WG的首席坦克平衡师最近离开了WG。我想公开的对他参与FTR的QA活动表示感谢,并且对他个人的友好以及(无论你对游戏怎么看都)在过去对游戏内车辆平衡性所做出的贡献。

– Havok will introduce the destructable houses option: some buildings will be made destructable. A player asked whether their debris will be material (eg. it will be possible to create your own barricade from debris) or immaterial. SerB states large debris will be material, smaller will be immaterial, as the server power is not sufficient to calculate everything
Havok会引入可摧毁房屋这个选项:某些房子会变成可摧毁的。有玩家询问这些房子的残骸是否会是实体(也就是说可以通过把房子拆掉,利用残骸来提供掩护)或者是非实体的。SerB表示大的残骸会是实体,而小的则不会。因为服务器没有强大到可以计算所有的东西
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/22

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/22/22-11-2013/
来源↗

As I wrote on FTR FB earlier, yesterday I missed the QA, because there was nothing to translate.
就像昨天在FTR的FaceBook主页上说过的一样,昨天没有QA,因为哪都没有可供翻译的东西

If you want, Overlord is collecting feedback on World of Warplanes – how do you like it?
如果你想干点什么的话,Overlord正在上述链接处收集战机世界的反馈—你对这个游戏怎么看? 

– SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35
SerB说那些老的金币车和奖励坦克(礼品车)的表现还算正常,例如公羊2,玛蒂尔达LL,T14,A32和Pz S35什么的
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/20

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/20-11-2013/
来源↗

– Q: “Why is it possible to actually destroy a tank by shooting it in its commander’s copula?” A: “It’s possible to destroy a tank by a shell penetration, by the penetration of shell fragments or by fragments of its own armor in the area behind armor. Commander’s copula provides direct access for the shells and their fragments to the area behind armor. So the logic is there. It’s like to complain that a house is also accessible via chimney, not just via door. It’s possible – not easy, bot possible”.
问:“为什么可以通过射击坦克的车长观测塔的位置把坦克打爆掉?”答:“坦克可以被击穿的炮弹摧毁,或者是被炮弹的碎片击穿,或者是由于装甲被击穿处背面的装甲碎片而摧毁掉。车长的观测塔给敌方炮弹和炮弹碎片提供了接近装甲背面的捷径。所以这就是为什么可以通过打观测塔把坦克打烂。就像抱怨你可以通过烟囱,而不是通过门进入一幢房子一样。的确有这种可能性—虽然实现难度挺高,但是还是有可能的。”
继续阅读