【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/17

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/17/17-2-2014/
来源↗

– apparently, the historical ranks of tank commanders in WoT are done correctly
WOT中车长的军衔是史实且正确的

– SerB thinks that the Chinese military ranks in the game are most likely 1955 PLA ranks – the info was provided by Chinese partners
SerB认为游戏中天朝的军衔都应该是1955年后的PLA的军衔了—这些信息是由中国方面的合作伙伴提供的

– SerB states that the British did some tests on the E-100 hull they captured, the vehicle proved to be quite bad
SerB表示英国对他们所缴获的E-100的车身做了一些测试,这辆车的质量很差  继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/16

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/16/16-2-2014/
来源↗

Check out Listy’s article about Chieftain (Part II)
记得去看看Listy的关于酋长的文章(第二部分)

– Italian heavy line? “No comment”
意大利重坦线?“不予置评”

– Italian ships will definitely appear in World of Warships and there is a chance there might also be Italian planes in WoWp
意大利的战舰们绝对会出现在战舰世界中的,战机世界中也有可能会出现意大利的飞机
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/15

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/15/12-2014/
来源↗

– it will not be possible to pay for gold by Bitcoin. SerB: “No – and you won’t be able to pay with candy wrappers either.”
不会允许通过比特币来交易金币的。SerB:“不行—用糖纸也不行。”

– apparently, more “old-style” Soviet premium vehicles (slow, well armored, like Matilda, KV-5, Valentine) will not be introduced (“there is enough of them in general as it is”)
不会有更多的“老式风格”的苏联金币车了(很慢,但是防护不错,例如玛蒂尔达,KV-5,瓦伦丁什么的)(“这样的车已经够多了”) 继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/14

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/14/14-2-2014/
来源↗

As you might have noticed, the next EU tier 10 on discount is the Jagdpanzer E-100, not the IS-4 (or E-50M), that was predicted earlier (based on the Russian/SEA pattern). That makes the next tier 10 on discount completely unpredictable from now on 🙁
正如你所注意到的,欧服的下一辆打折的10级车是E-100突击车,而不是此前根据毛服/海服的规律所预测的IS-4(或者E-50M)。这就意味着下一辆打折的10级车从现在开始就是完全不可预测的了-3- 

– apparently, the RU servers are suffering from the same lag issues as the EU ones (SS: good, that means it’s not EU-specific)
现在毛服和欧服一样有着游戏卡顿的问题(SS:不错,至少这不是只有欧服才有的情况)
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/13

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/13/13-2-2014/
来源↗

Overlord is asking, what do you think of 8.11? You can leave your opinion here
Overlord在问大家关于8.11的各路意见。你可以在以上链接处发表观点。 

– national battles as “assault” and “encounter” are not planned
没计划要搞出国别战版的“夺旗战”和“攻防战”

– Storm on MM rules (why battletier 12 was removed): “MM tries to spread the tanks equally through their battletiers. That’s why tier 8′s are waiting in queue for tier 10′s in order to create battles of appropriate battletiers. More free tier 10 tanks means less waiting time for tier 8′s”
Storm对于MM分房规则的说法(为什么12级战斗等级被移除):“MM会试图把一辆坦克的分房均匀的分配在它可能进入的战斗等级中。这就是为什么8级车们会在队列中等待10级车,以进入合适的战斗等级中。更多的10级车意味着8级车的等待时间更短。” 继续阅读

Storm询问8.11的卡顿现象

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/13/storm-asks-about-8-11-microfreezes/
来源↗

Source: http://world-of-kwg.livejournal.com/276778.html
真·来源↗ 

Hello everyone,
大家嚎, 

Storm heard the reports that there are allegedly a lot microfreezes What he understands by that are short sharp drops in FPS and short lags in tank movement, shooting etc. in 8.11.
Storm表示他收到很多关于游戏内出现了卡顿现象的报告。他个人表示这些情况都是在8.11补丁后,坦克移动过程和射击过程中帧数快速下降和网络卡顿导致的。
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/12

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/12/12-2-2014/
来源↗

– Storm states that the fact artillery MM weight was reduced by 10 percent does not mean that artillery absolutely cannot appear as a top top vehicle of the team, it only means the chance of such a thing happening is much lower
Storm表示火炮的分房权重下降了10%以后并不意味着火炮绝对不会作为班长出现在战斗中,这只意味着发生这种事情的概率会小很多罢了

– it is a known fact that WG support employees can be mistaken: recently, a player asked on RU forums whether the spall liner reduced chance of crew being wounded applies only to HE shells. The support employee answered that yes, but Storm states that it works for all shells.
众所周知,WG的客服一直在犯错误:进来有毛服玩家在论坛上问,内衬所带来的对组员受伤的保护效果是否只适用于HE弹。客服说是的,但是Storm表示保护效果适用于所有弹种。
注:此处与Wiki有严重冲突,Wiki说明内衬只对HE的溅射等等有效果,对其他击穿弹种无效。此处翻译菌持保留意见。

继续阅读