来源：[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/19/19-6-2013/]
翻译：[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6324650]

19.6.2013

Today’s issue is “interesting”. Basically, what happened: a flood of artywhiners, moaning about arty nerfs started spamming the developer thread and SerB switched to troll mode, as he usually does. Well… you’ll see.
今天有非常大量的抱怨帖叫骂帖，所以SerB一如既往地开启了嘲讽模式。另外因为SerB嘲讽的问题通常没有意义，我会把它们集中放在最后。

– red screen of death is apparently back for 0.8.6, happens allegedly in sniper mode, the new detail reduction system automatically sets everything to minimum and then crashes. SerB’s answer: “Write a support ticket”
红屏问题在8.6又出现了，新的图象设置里有个“动态调整画面效果”的选项，看来是这个玩意的不正常工作引起了很多游戏崩溃问题。
SerB的回答：“请联系客服部门。”
继续阅读 →

17.6.2013

原文:[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/17/17-6-2013/]
翻译:[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6319239]

– Q: “Are you afraid that we the people will get angry if our wishes to nerf arty will not be heard?” A: “Megalomania is bad. Take care of yourself.”
“如果8.6里火炮泛滥的情况没有好转，然后你们还不肯接受削弱火炮的要求，我们会很生气，你们怕不怕？”
“狂妄自大是种病，洗洗睡吧孩子。”

– SerB on large caliber artillery shells ricocheting from thin surfaces: “Yes well, 8 inch naval shells did ricochet from the 25mm thick cruiser armor plates, so?” (SS: some players suspect Wargaming of
somehow screwing with ricochets for HEAT arty shells by disabling overmatch)
“为什么我觉得火炮的炮弹更容易跳弹？”
“8英寸炮还会在巡洋舰的25mm装甲板上跳弹呢，咋了？”

– HEAT ricochet angle is 80 degrees, regular ricochet is 70 degrees
8.6里，HEAT的跳弹角度是80度，AP和APCR是70度。
继续阅读 →

欧系萨布里德斯,贴主最近休假很长时间没更新,望见谅.

原文: [http://ftr.wot-news.com/]
翻译: [http://bbs.ngacn.cc/nuke.php?func=ucp&uid=2169337]

9.6.2013

– you hear the sounds not from the spot where your tank is, but where your camera is: that’s why you can’t hear the sound of your own shooting when in arty satellite view, because the camera is high away from your vehicle
你在战斗中能听到哪些声音由你的镜头位置和距离决定，所以火炮在鹰眼模式时通常都不会听到自己开炮的声效。 (因为镜头离自己太远了)

– apparently there are differences in additional XP between RU and NA server (NA server gets extra XP for some archievements as parts of some events, RU server doesn’t), SerB doesn’t think it’s a big of a deal (“Experience depends on how you play. You play well, you get experience, you don’t play well, you don’t get experience, you don’t read the rules of this thread, you’ll get a RO ban”)
俄服跟美服的“拿勋章奖励经验/银币”活动安排没有必要保持一致。
(俄服原文是有人抱怨 “战斗中拿到特定勋章就奖励额外i的经验/银币” 的活动在俄服没有了，美服还有，不公平。但其实俄服的勋章活动已经合并到每个周末的定期活动里，美服勋章活动和周末活动的时间则是错开的，安排不同而已。)

– apparently, the Superpershing will also get some sort of buff along with its frontal armor nerf, to keep its winrate around 49 percent
超潘看来会在某些方面获得增强，用来补偿前装甲的削弱，让超潘的胜率可以保持在49%上下。
继续阅读 →

8.6.2013

来源：[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/8-6-2013/]
NGA翻译: [http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6296431]

– Storm, when asked, whether World of Tanks can get such physics as on this video, Storm states that the server couldn’t handle it and without server support, there would be way too many graphic issues
有玩家贴了个视频，问WoT会不会有那种物理效果。(视频是一个叫“Spin Tires ”，开着各种大型轮式车辆翻山越岭的模拟驾驶游戏，看介绍不是联网游戏，跟WoT没什么可比性。)
Storm表示WoT的服务器无法承担那种计算量，而没有服务器支持的话，将会出现很多问题。

– Q: “Did you nerf FCM 50t profitability?” A: “That’s not our area of expertise, sorry, that’s a matter for a psychologist”
“你们是不是偷偷砍了FCM 50t 的银币收益？”
“抱歉，这个问题不属于我们的专业领域，请去找心理学家咨询。”
(被害妄想党你好，被害妄想党再见。)

– apparently, on RU server players are getting banned for even mentioning War Thunder
有个人出来问为啥他哥们因为提到战争雷霆被禁言了三天，SerB在回答里贴了个基辅独立广场的地图链接，没有提到那个被禁言人的ID，也没有任何证明表示那人到底说了啥。
来龙去脉和问答的意义都不明白，不知道为啥SS就思路广地把这理解为 “俄服只要提到战争雷霆就会被禁言”—— 如果真的连提都不能提，那一直以来SerB和Storm都有回答关于战争雷霆的相关问题又是怎么回事？

– apparently, Port won’t be taken down for rework
地图“港口”目前没有回炉修改的计划。

– when dealing with teamkills, developers (or, rather, all WG people) don’t really care “who started”
对于TK惩罚的判断，系统不会管“是谁先挑事”，就算找开发人员来评理也一样。
(“他先打的我。”“误伤。”“他没道歉。”“我开炮的时候他过来挡枪了不是我错。”“他打中第一发还在瞄着我。”“我瞄的是他挡住的敌人。”“不行他铁心要TK我我必须先把他干死。”“自己挡了枪就来TK我难道我还等死？”。。。。。。以上，WG闲人再多也无法处理茫茫多的小学生水平吵架。。。)
继续阅读 →

6.6.2013
来源：[http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/662013.html]
翻译:  [http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6290532]

首先是超潘决定不会削弱车体前装甲，来源是其中一个开发人员的博客：
[http://valltergaming.blogspot.de/2013/06/86-fate-of-superpershing.html]
超潘在后面的8.6测试服里大概还会是削过的车体，不过在8.6正式服里会改回8.5的样子。另外也进行了一些讨论，寻求在不冒犯超潘玩家的前提下解决超潘车体与历史不符的问题。

然后是关于超潘的下架：
来源是老地方，Livejournal上的博客：
[http://world-of-kwg.livejournal.com/203937.html]
Also, Slavamakarov (surprisingly his real name is Slava Makarov, one of the producers/developer head honchos) confirmed that Superpershing will be taken away from the shop. It is not yet decided whether this will be a permanent thing, or just temporary. It’s also not yet sure when that happens. He himself was the author of this proposal and it was approved by SerB and Storm, he doesn’t view it as a compromise.
其中一个开发人员Slavamakarov提出了让超潘下架的建议，并且已经得到了SerB和Storm的批准。
下架时间未定，到底是永远下架还是暂时下架也没决定，不过棒子服已经出了公告，说因为WG通知超潘要下架，所以本周的超潘打折活动也会取消。
[棒服公告]
继续阅读 →

5.6.2013
来源：[http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/562013.html]
翻译:[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6287935]

– Q: “KV-1S with 122mm is not historical”
A: “Home-educated experts, huh?” (and SerB adds the picture of 122mm KV-1S)
“KV-1S的122炮不符合历史！”
“嗯，键盘历史学家的意见？”(然后SerB贴了张图，吃我122啦,呆逼)

– the vehicle on the above picture is KV-122 by the way. It’s possible that in time, KV-1S will move to tier 5 and will become a hull module option for the KV-1 for more historicity
上面那图更确切地说是KV-122。以后有可能会把KV-1S降到5级并且成为KV-1的一个可选车体部件，这样就更符合历史了。

– SerB states that the “maps are being remade for arty to better hits tanks behind covers” is just a conspiracy theory
SerB表示“之前重做的地图都专注于修改掩体以便让火炮更容易打到掩体后的车”这种完全是脑补阴谋论的意见。 (当然，某些地图修改确实有削弱防炮掩体的安全度，但这并不代表所有的地图修改动机)
继续阅读 →