第12级战斗等级被移除——这到底意味着什么？

发表于由
1

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/07/removal-of-battletier-12-what-does-it-mean/
来源↗

Hello everyone,
大家嚎， 

there seems to be some confusion about the announced removal of battletier 12 in 8.11 (on Tuesday), so I’d like to shed some light on the issue. Personally, I was just as confused as you are, but in the end, I think I understood what the developers meant by this and it is a pretty elegant solution indeed.
貌似自从前几天说过要移除第12级战斗等级之后，就一直存在着一些迷惑的声音，所以我决定对这个问题进行一下说明。就我个人来讲，我和你们有着差不多的疑问。但是在最后，我想我明白了为什么开发团队要这么搞，而这又是一个多么简单明了的解决方案。 继续阅读 →

论德国的装甲质量

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/06/on-german-armour/
来源↗
本文作者为EnsignExpandable，仅代表作者本人观点。
转载请注明出处以及原作者。 

A while ago, I wrote a Q&A special on Soviet tank armour. Since then I have gotten periodic requests to do a similar special on German tank armour. Initially, I did not intend to write such an article, but duty calls. However, this is no ordinary article.
不久之前，我做了一份专注于苏联装甲的QA。在那之后我就一直收到有人想要我做一个类似的但是是关于德国人装甲的QA的请求。一开始呢，我本来是不想写的，但是使命在肩，我不得不写。然而这并不是一篇普通的文章。

Usually, archive materials do not particularly surprise me. I see a “that’s interesting” here and there, maybe a “huh, I didn’t know that”. I’ve even come to terms with ridiculous things that happen when you try to compare reports from the two sides involved. But this, this is something unprecedented. Many things I have written shocked my readers, but this discovery shocked even me.
通常来讲呢，档案之类的东西其实并不会让我感到惊讶。我经常会在各处发现“挺有意思的”内容，偶尔会有“恩，我不知道这事嘛”的样子。我个人碰到过许多把参与某事件的双方的报告进行对比时，出现非常奇怪的状况的例子。但是以下的东西是史无前例的。我曾经写出的很多东西都震惊了我的读者，但是以下发现甚至震惊了我自己。 继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/07

发表于由
回复

Source:
来源↗

– developers are investigating alleged FPS drops on very high end computers (Win8)
开发团队正在调查所谓的在高端电脑上（WIN8）的帧数下降问题

– Q: “Please implement a ‘one minute remaining’ gong in the battle” A: “And girls in bikini, yes”
问：“请把一个提示你战斗只剩1分钟的响声加入游戏吧”答：“还有穿比基尼的美女，恩，没问题。” 继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/06（内附视野改动）

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/06/6-2-2014/
来源↗

– Storm confirms, T49 will come this year (SS: T49 LT is a project to upgun Walker Bulldog with 90mm)
Storm肯定说今年就会有T49的（SS：T49轻坦是要把华科猛犬的主炮强化到90mm的一个计划）

– Sheridan appearing in WoT? “No chance”
谢里登坦克会不会出现在WOT里？“没机会的”
译注：谢里登坦克，代号为M-551，该车为美国的轻型坦克，专门作为空降坦克使用。该车由通用汽车研发——摘抄自维基百科此页面

– Storm is not happy with the fact that a tank can “disappear” when not moving and “reappears” when it starts moving again, he thinks about changing this somehow
Storm对现在一辆坦克在不动时“消失”，而在它重新开始移动时又会“出现”的情况表示不高兴，他在考虑对这个做出一些改动
继续阅读 →

Storm询问玩家对于WOT的意见

发表于由
6

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/05/storm-asks-for-player-opinions-on-wot/
来源↗

Source: http://world-of-kwg.livejournal.com/274677.html
真·来源↗ 

Hello everyone,
大家嚎， 

Storm made a summary post, asking players, what they would like WG to address in WoT. From the discussion:
Storm发了个总结帖，帖子中在询问各位玩家他们想要WG在游戏中搞出些什么。以下是讨论区的内容：

– Wargaming knows about bots and Storm says they will fight them, but he also says there are much fewer of them than what players think, “less than 1 percent of all players” (there is an analysis running, after that botters will be banned)
WG知道挂机党的存在，Storm表示他们会继续和他们做斗争，但是他同时也说挂机党的数量比大家想的要少得多“只有不到1%的全体玩家是挂机的”（有分析正在进行当中，在那之后，挂机党们就会被Ban掉了） 继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/05 （内附三测改动）

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/05/5-2-2014/
来源↗

Yurko2F explains how camo works:
Yurko2F解释了隐蔽究竟是如何工作的： 

“Camouflage is a coefficient. As an example, take 0.5 – that means that a tank with 400 meter viewrange will see the enemy with 0,5 camo factor at (400*0.5) = 200 meters. Movement and shooting increase this coefficient, while camo net and camo skill reduce it. Specific values won’t be disclosed, for individual tanks they can be found quite easily in training room.”
“隐蔽是个系数。举个栗子吧，就拿0.5做个比方来说—这就是说一辆视野为400m的坦克将会在 (400*0.5) = 200 米处发现一个具有0.5的隐蔽系数的敌方坦克。移动以及射击会造成该系数的上升，但伪装网和隐蔽技能会降低该系数。我们不会公布具体的数值，但是对于特定坦克来说，在训练房里自己试一试就行了。”  继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2014/02/04

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/04/4-2-2014/
来源↗

– there is no set rule that certain damage in game has to correspond to certain caliber (SS: for example 150mm guns don’t have to deal 750 or 850 damage, the number can be completely different)
游戏中并没有相关规定表示伤害就一定要和某个口径挂钩（SS：例如150mm主炮的单发伤害不一定要是750或者850，数字可以搞成完全不同的）

– DW2 OP or UP? “If the tank stats stand out, I will fix it”
DW2太强或者太弱了？“如果坦克数据太突出（过强/过弱的话），我会搞定的” 继续阅读 →