Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/08/8-8-2013/
来源：↗

– confirmed: RU second medium branch will start from T-34 and end with T-54, Object 140 will be a tier 10, unlockable from T-54, Object 430 and the other T9 tank will come later

已确认毛子的新中坦线是从T-34开始分线，合流在T-54上，而140工程作为可解锁的10级车出现（从T-54身上练出来）。430工程和其他九级车晚些再加入。（所以如果我没理解错，以后会有三辆10级毛子中坦。）

– penetration reduction with distance is set for each shell individually
每种弹药都有自己的穿深衰减
继续阅读 →

Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/07/7-8-2013/
来源↗

– Japanese tree in 2013, or in 2014? “When it’s done it’s done” (SS: current info is that it will come in early 2014, possibly January)
日本科技树是2013还是2014？ “等着吧!” （SS：现有资讯显示14年年初，可能是一月）

– ballistic trajectory angle is taken into account, when calculating penetration
当计算是否击穿装甲时，炮弹的弹道也是计算在内的。 

– maximum ballistic trajectory angle does not necesserily correspond to the maximum gun elevation angle, it can be higher sometimes (SS: when for example the vehicle is firing when standing on a slope)
最大的炮弹弹道和炮管的最大仰角是不需要保持一致的，有的时候它会更高。（SS：举个栗子，比如一辆坦克在一个斜坡上开火）
继续阅读 →

So, it looks like the Stalin issue is the Rage of the Week on EU forums. Hmm… there should be an official announcement in the afternoon on WG EU portal. The feedback on RU server on this decision is overwhelmingly positive, with RU players mostly going like “hahaha suck that Europe” – plus making a lot of anti-Polish jokes
关于斯大林标语那事现在在欧服论坛上讨论很火爆啊……恩，今天有了一个官方的帖子出来说明这个事。 这事在毛服的反应是压倒性的，都是支持WG的做法。（WG的做法是在8.8会统一把关于斯大林的标语重新上线）而且大多数毛子玩家的反应都是“蛤蛤！你们这群欧服的[咳咳]们！”还有一大批反波兰的笑话。

– tanks with ATGM’s? “I’ll say it like this, if this comes, it will be in another game”
会不会有使用反坦克导弹的坦克？“我直说吧，要是真的有了，这个游戏就变了”

– AA tanks with machineguns are not planned for now, SerB actually states the amount of shells from them might crash the servers
带机关枪的防空坦克现在暂时不会有，SerB明确表示（他们的）子弹数量会导致服务器崩溃

– the T-34-3 is armed with a 122mm gun – for now (SS: there have been several reports of this gun being changed, presumably to some D-10T clone)
现在T-34-3用的是一杆122MM管子——只是现在。（SS：有许多报告说这竿炮变了，大概是D-10T的复刻版）
继续阅读 →

Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/05/5-8-2013/

– looks like Russian players playing on EU server want the “Stalin” inscriptions back. SerB reacts: “Write an appeal to the appropriate office, that’ll be more useful.
看起来在欧服的毛子玩家很像把“斯大林”标语给弄回来。SerB表示：“给客服写个请愿书，这样会更有效。”（翻译菌：你们标语这事争了多久了……）

– WoT is influenced by real life politics too: for example in China, it’s forbidden to use real map on CW map
WOT的确会被现实中的事情影响，例如在天朝，领土战的地图不是真正的（世界地图）。
继续阅读 →

Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/02/2-8-2013/
来源↗

– (SS: if I understand this correctly) it’s theoretically possible to detrack a vehicle by a HE shell, even if it hits the vehicle somewhere else. When the HE shell “damage sphere” forms (to determine which modules can be hit), the armor layer itself doesn’t limit it, so it’s possible for the tracks to be caught within it, even if the shell penetrated the armor somewhere else and exploded “inside” the vehicle
(SS：如果我的理解没问题的话）一枚HE炮弹在没有击中履带的情况下在理论上是有可能导致履带断掉的。当HE造成伤害时，溅射模型开始判定哪些模块收到了伤害，装甲层本身并不限制（这个模型），所以履带被算在模型中是有可能的，在HE穿透了装甲并在“车体内”爆炸之后依然是可能的。

– the deciding factor in whether a mod is illegal or not is the question, whether it gives the player a clear ingame advantage. If it does, it’s most likely illegal
判断一个MOD是否是非法的只基于一个标准，就是它会不会给玩家带来非常明显的游戏内的优势。假如它做到了，那么这差不多就是非法的。
继续阅读 →

今天的忽悠量不多，大家将就着看吧。
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/01/1-8-2013/

– SerB on historical battles: “In War Thunder, it’s possible in historical battles to fly with Dora from 1944 against Mig-15 from the 50′s over Stalingrad. We don’t like this variant, that’s why we are doing more complex system.”
SerB对历史战的看法：“战争雷霆里，你开着1944年的‘虎’式飞机与50年代来的米格-15在斯大林格勒上方战斗是可能的。但是我们不喜欢这个’历史’，这就是为什么我们要做一个更复杂的系统然后糊他们一脸”

– in WG statistics, winrate plays more important role than damage per battle, because “dealing damage is not the only way how to secure victory”
在WG眼中，胜率比每场平均输出所扮演的角色更加重要，因为“输出不是唯一确保胜利的途径。”
继续阅读 →