Storm对于0.8.6的一些说法(隐蔽改动!)

来源:http://valltergaming.blogspot.de/2013/06/86-news-from-workplaces.html

第二来源:http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/storm-on-086.html

俄文原文:http://world-of-kwg.livejournal.com/202859.html

本文合并了两篇文章,因为在某些方面SS说的更多……当然,也有可能是SS错了。

Hi all!
小盆浴们大家好!
Some brand-new information based on the most popular questions regarding 8.6 update. We’ve considered your feedback. The following is currently being….
今天我带来的是自从8.6公测以后的一些很热门的问题。

我们看到了你们的反馈。下面就是我们的回应……

… worked on:

……我们最近在搞:

  • The most important – we decided to restore most of the camouflage system to the 8.5 versions, with the following exceptions:
  • 最最最最重要的一点-我们决定把隐蔽系统调回0.8.5的版本,除了以下的改动:

【Developer Q&A 】2013/6/3–R2D2

3.6.2013  外挂装甲卫星;超潘削弱未定;T23有望回归
来源:[http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/362013.html]
翻译:[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6282484]

– currently, the spare tracks attached on the armor have no influence on armor thickness, because theoretically after first hit they’d have to fall off. The developers will first implement client physics (spare tracks falling off after being hit) and then will rethink the whole issue
目前坦克模型上的外挂备用履带对于实际装甲厚度没有影响,因为理论上一旦被打中,这些东西就会掉下来失效。所以开发人员会先把客户端物理效果 (可以显示外挂履带板、工具箱之类被打飞的效果) 搞好,再来考虑这个问题。
(其实现在某些外挂履带板已经有间隙装甲效果,例如傻邱7升级炮塔侧面那几块履带板算作间隙装甲,不过正面的两块没有效果。)

– SerB can’t promise, what the number of HAVOK patch will look like, whether it will be one of the 0.8.X series, or 0.9
Havok客户端物理引擎会在哪个补丁出现,还没有决定。

– dynamic collision model will come hand in hand with its visual respresentation (SS: As an example, if a part of original hitbox “falls off” using Havok (for example a piece of box, or external tanks), the hitbox will change too”
动态碰撞模型系统会随着动态的外观模型系统的引入而出现。 (看来是指Havok客户端物理效果在外观模型上的改变也会实际改变车辆的碰撞模型,例如外挂履带板打飞后这块的装甲防御会稍微弱一点之类?)

– regarding the aforementioned client physics implementation, it’s being worked on, it will work so that for example Schmalturm Panzer IV’s mesh side armor (Schurzen) will fly off after being hit, it’s possible that after its implementation, there will be additional armor implemented, such as sandbags
上述的 (外观模型破坏) 效果已经在制作中,包括外挂履带板和四号的网格侧裙之类的都可以打飞。另外,这个系统实装后,可能也会推出附加装甲板、沙包之类的外部设备。
继续阅读

女王火炮前瞻

所有的名字都是暂译……整篇文章的漏洞很多,但是还是翻译过来了。不保证消息的准确性。

你说没有T6火炮?找伊利丹原作者要去……

http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/british-arty-preview.html

—–以下为正文—–

Source: TheJoves’ video
来源:TheJoves的视频 ↑
A short preview of British arty, that is somewhat confirmed to come in 8.7 (but it’s also possible they will postpone it to 8.8, nothing is confirmed totally).

对女王的炸B的一次前瞻。这个线很有可能在8.7里加入(当然也有可能拖到8.8,现在什么都没有确定下来。)

Tier 2 unknown arty (SS: I think it’s Universal Gun Carrier – a light howitzer on Universal Carrier chassis)
T2火炮,名字未知(SS:我觉得吧是个通用武器运载器【译者注:暂译】【和丘吉尔GC一个尿性】-一个装在通用底盘上的小号榴弹炮)
– the blogger speculates that it might have good horizontal arc and if I understood this correctly, he said that the whole British arty branch will be characterized by good traverse angles
-原作者说这个玩意的仰角很大,如果我的理解无误的话。他说整条女王的炸B线的特性就是转速。
– It’s gun is a 76mm 13pdr, pen 42, damage 165

-用的炮是76毫米的13磅炮,穿深42MM,伤害165.
继续阅读

Ensign’s Q&A Answers #6

By EnsignExpendable

Previous edition here.

Q: How was the Sherman compared to the T-34 by the red army? Did they perhaps like them any better? Worse?

A: The Sherman was seen as a good tank, with a very nice gun. Tankers lamented the flat side armour and tall profile, but enjoyed the quality of the interior finish and comfortable seats. Tank infantry like Shermans too, since they shook a lot less in motion. Hooking up their belts to a Sherman, they could remain still enough to shoot more or less accurately at a distance of 100-150 meters, just enough to either suppress or drive off Panzerfaust soldiers hiding in ruins.

Q: Do you have any info about Germans capturing Soviet tanks, and how they modified those?
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/6/2–R2D2

来源:[http://ftr-wot.blogspot.cz/2013/06/262013.html]
翻译
:[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6279615]

2.6.2013
– there is no free skill reset planned in connection with new camo system introduction
8.6不会因为隐蔽机制修改而提供免费的技能重置。

– the initiative to change the camo system apparently came from SerB
修改隐蔽机制是SerB提出的主意。

– WoT not suitable for cybersport? “You don’t have to take part in cybersport events”
“WoT不适合作为电子竞技?”
“又不是非得要你参与电子竞技的活动。”

继续阅读

The T23 Medium Tank(历史资料以及可能重新回归WOT内)

Author: Priory_of_Sion

For those who have been playing WoT for a while should recognize the name “T23”. The T23 was a tier 8 American Medium before the M46 and M48. Ever since the removal of the T23 there has been a lot of player support to reinstate the T23 as a higher tier American Premium.

There is a problem with that though, beyond the fact WG has no current plans for it. As you should know premium vehicles are usually kept exactly as they were/suppose to be in real life. The T23, as it was in real life, would be terrible as anything over tier 6.

The T23 was developed in 1943 and at the time was a perfectly fine tank. It was equipped with the M1A1 76 mm gun and had 500 gross horsepower. The first pilot T23 was fitted with a quickly produced cast turret, the next couple of pilots came with the same turret as the T20(stock turret in WoT), and the last pilots and the production series of T23 were equipped with a new turret(used in the later M4 Shermans).

This is the T23 with VVS suspension and the same turret as the T20.

继续阅读