【WOWS Q&A】2016/09/24

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/09/24/wows-qa-24th-september-2016/
来源↗

Source: Ph3lan (WoWS EU Staff)
来源：Ph3lan（WOWS欧服的工作人员）

1) How exactly does the points distribution system work in game? Ex. you are the last one against 4 ships, enemies are far from 1000 points, your cap is not in danger (so it still generates points for you), there is still enough time but anyway battle finishes. Why? This mechanism makes it impossible to get the achievement of Lonesome fighter.
1) 游戏内的这个点数分配到底是怎么回事？比方说你是最后一艘幸存的船，面对地方4艘船，敌人离拿满1000分还很有很长时间，你这边的占领圈并没有受到威胁（所以依然可以产出分数），离战斗结束还有足够的时间但是战斗还是结束了。为什么啊？这个机制直接让获得“单挑之王”这个成就变成了不可能。

继续阅读 →

【WOWS Q&A】2016/09/22

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/09/22/wows-qa-22th-september-2016/
来源↗

Thanks to Babykim, EU
感谢欧服的Babykim

On the nerf of premium ships.
关于削弱金币船

Background: This discussion pertains to the upcoming nerf of the Błyskawica and the Anshan, the details of which I am not familiar with (Chinese leak?). Apparently, the upcoming nerf will not be specific to the above two premium ships, but a systemic nerf that applies to all destroyers.
背景消息：这些讨论是关于接下来要对闪电和鞍山进行的Nerf，但是具体怎么削我还是不知道（中国那边流露出的消息？）。消息是说这次削弱并不仅限于这两艘金币船，而是对于所有驱逐舰的系统性的削弱。

继续阅读 →

【WOWS Q&A】2016/09/20

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/09/21/wows-qa-20-september-2016/#more-33280
来源↗

译注：删除了一些以前回答过的问题和与游戏本身没关系的问题

Original Source

由godzilla5549 进行总结

Q1
问：

Is there an internal focus on making Aircraft Carriers more into a “support” class? I know from previous responses that you (WG St.Petersburg) intend to make the Air Superiority loadouts more popular as a means to “support” or “help” the team and defend from other Aircraft Carrier attacks. My problem with this is that currently Air Superiority carriers do not really do much for the team, and I can easily play a Strike (no fighters) carrier and have much more effect on the battle. An Air Superiority carrier cannot defend from my attacks, and as such, does not really “help” the team at all. I much prefer to be dealing direct damage, as I have a much greater influence on the outcome of a battle and can provide support to the team by taking out high valued targets.
你们内部有没有准备把航母改成一个“支援型”的定位的计划？我知道从之前的恢复中来看你们（WG的圣彼得堡工作室）是想把制空权的配置的人气提高，作为一种“辅助”或者是“帮助”团队乘员，抵抗对方航母的进攻的这么一种角色。我觉得这么改的问题是现在制空权航母对团队来说贡献不大，而且那种纯突击型的航母（不带舰战）对于战斗结果的影响反而更大。制空配置的航母根本没办法抵挡我的攻击，所以对于队伍的贡献也是几乎没有的。我更喜欢直接造成伤害，因为这样的话会对战斗的影响更大一些，而且还能通过干掉那些重点目标来支援我的队友们。

继续阅读 →

【WOWS Q&A】2016/09/16

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/09/16/wows-qa-16th-september-2016/#more-32996
来源↗

Thanks to Babykim, EU
感谢欧服的Babykim

The Q&A by BadPreacher and Sub_Octavian dated September 13
以下是BadPreacher和Sub_Octavian在9月13日翻译的QA

Q: What will be the difference between the premium HMAS Perth and the HMS Leander from the RM cruiser tree.
问：金币的那个帕斯和英巡银币线里面那个利安德有什么区别啊？

继续阅读 →