Viktor Kislyi的QA

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/viktor-kislyi-q.html
来源↗

Hello warriors,
大家嚎,

to explain the current string of failures and bad decisions, Viktor Kislyi, Wargaming CEO, invited several important Youtubers, Streamers (only Russian ones of course) to sunny Cyprus for an interview. Here’s what he said:
为了解释这一连串的失败和错误的决定,Viktor Kislyi,也就是WG的CEO邀请了一些重要的Youtube视频作者,主播(当然只有毛子的了)去阳光明媚的塞浦路斯进行一次采访。以下是他所说的:

Victor-Kislyi1
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A】2015/11/05

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/05112015-q.html
来源↗

– The 9.12 test is still rather unstable, it will be fixed
9.12的测试服还是有些不稳定,会修复的

– T92 Light Tank might appear in WoT but only as a premium and its introduction is not certain
T92轻坦有可能会出现在WOT中,但是只会作为金币车出,而且到底会不会出也不知道
继续阅读

Yuri Pasholok的QA (2015/11/04)

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/yuri-pasholok-q-04112015.html
来源↗

– Regarding the Type 62 and WZ-131 in WoT, it’s a successful example of making a light tank out of a medium one. The Americans wanted to do the same thing (T20 Medium Tank into T21) but in the end didn’t do it for a number of reasons, but in the case of the Type 62, the vehicle was successful since it’s still in service in a number of countries
WOT中的WZ-131和62式是个很好的把中坦改成了轻坦的栗子。美国人也想做一样的事情(T20中坦改成T21)但是由于各种各样的原因没去做,但是62式的话很成功,因为这辆车依然还在一些国家服役中

– The ingame 121/121B are predecessors of Type 69, which was an improved version of Type 59. The 121 designation was selected because WoT has a limit on how old (or rather new) vehicles can appear in the game (and 1969 was too new), although this limit was later broken anyway in order to provide some nations with adequate hightier vehicles (for example the case of STB-1)
游戏内的121/121B是69式的前身,而69式是59式的升级版而已。之所以选择121这个代号是因为WOT有一个关于到底多旧(或者说多新)的车才能够出现在游戏里的限制(1969年就已经算成太新了),然而这个限制后面也由于要给部分国家挑选合适的高级车而被打破了(比如STB-1就是这样)
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A】2015/11/03

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/03112015-q.html
来源↗

– Official reason for the 9.12 patch is that the 9 11 numbers are associated with the 9/11 terror attack in New York, that is why it was decided to call the patch 9.12
关于为什么9.10的下个补丁不是9.11而是直接蹦到9.12的原因是9/11的恐怖袭击,正因为此他们才直接把补丁蹦到9.12

– Developers decided to scrap the 10.0 update because of the overwhelmingly negative player feedback
开发团队决定放弃掉10.0补丁的原因是有太多太多负面的玩家反馈了
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A】2015/11/02

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/02112015-q.html
来源↗

– Storm refuses to confirm that 10.0 will not come (this info however appears in multiple sources now, including major Russian bloggers) – he states: “Let me put it this way: the picture is much more complicated”
Storm拒绝承认10.0不会上线这一事实(然而这条消息已经从在很多地方都出现了,包括很多主要的毛子的博主)—他说:“我这么说好了:这件事比想象中要复杂的多”

– Storm further on 10.0: “Sorry, I will not comment anymore simply to refrain from hints at me or the company. Then the streamer guys take everything, twist it and make “interesting” videos about it. I am not interested in that.”
Storm对于10.0的进一步说法:“不好意思,我不能再说了,这也是为了防止从我或者是公司这边来的任何有关的消息。之后那些主播就把这些消息整合一下,然后顺手扭曲一下,再搞一个“有趣”的视频。我对这种事没兴趣。”
继续阅读

Yuri Pasholok的QA(2015/11/01)

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/11/yuri-pasholoks-q-01112015.html
来源↗

Hello Warriors,
大家嚎,

here is another Q&A batch for you from Yuri Pasholok:
以下是Yuri Pasholok回答的另一大波QA:

– M4 Sherman with FL-10 turret was considered, if WG decides to implement it, it’s possible to do it, but the question is where to put it since WoT doesn’t have Arabian crews
曾经的确是有过想要给M4谢尔曼装上一个FL-10炮塔的计划,如果WG想要弄出这辆车的话也是可以弄的,但是问题在于这辆车到底要放在哪,因为WOT并没有阿拉伯的乘员
继续阅读