【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/06

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/06/6-12-2013/
来源↗

– the fact WT RhB 128mm now has a muzzle brake has no effect on its camo factor
莱茵金属武器运输车的128炮现在有了炮口制退器对它的隐蔽系数没有影响

– Chi-Ri can mount a rammer even when it has an autoloading gun (no other autoloader tank has that): this is not a mistake, SerB states that rammer is mounted on a tank independently, not tied to a gun
五式中戦車 チリ就算在使用弹夹炮的情况下都可以装一个输弹机(所有其他的弹夹炮都做不到):这并不是一个失误,SerB表示说输弹机是独立安装在坦克上的,和炮没什么关系

继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/05

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/05/5-12-2013/
来源↗ 

Important: Something urgent came up. Feedback to 8.10 (tests, screenshots and such) will be posted later than usual, I will do it in the night when I come back.
重要信息:我有点急事,8.10的反馈(测试,截图啥的)会比往常稍晚一些发出来,我会在我回来那天的晚上再搞的。

Something to read while the test installs. Not much though:
在等测试服安装的时候看看下面的东西吧。当然不多就是了:
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/03

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/03/3-12-2013/
来源↗

An interesting thing. SerB and Storm pretty much stopped answering (busy I guess), there’s a new developer guy in the thread though (nickname Yurko2F) – his answers are less funny, but quite technical and detailed. Will try to capture it properly. Also, this guy seems to answer whining politely. He will learn…
先讲个有意思的事。SerB和Storm已经不怎么回答问题了(我估计正忙着呢),但是QA帖子里出现了一个新的开发团队的人(绰号Yurko2F)—他的答案看起来没那么有趣,但是细节部分很充实,且技术性很强。我会试图好好翻译的。 另外,这货看起来对喷子还是很有礼貌的。他会慢慢尝到……

– the “tent” in the base (the boxes and whatnot) will also be penetrable in 8.10 – it will change the base capture dynamics
基地里的那个“帐篷”(盒子和一些乱七八糟的)在8.10中也将成为可摧毁物体——它会对占家的形式有一些影响
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/02

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/02/2-12-2013/
来源↗

Hello everyone,
大家好 

check out Listy’s article about Comet vs Tigers clash. Also, Chieftain posted a pretty interesting article on wacky British/US projects 🙂
看看Listy的关于彗星Vs虎式的文章吧。另外,Chieftain发了一篇关于英国/美国奇怪的计划的文章 🙂

Unfortunately, yesterday and today there were no developer answers whatsoever, with one exception:
不幸的是,除了以下这条之外,昨天和今天都没有任何的答复。 

– there won’t be special (specific) Taiwanese crew (and other insignia etc) for Taiwanese tanks
台湾坦克不会有特殊的(或者说特有的)组员(以及其他记号) 

I am thinking of including a part of daily translations specifically for WoWp QA, as there now is (since November) a dedicated QA thread (just like for WoT). Is it worth it?
我在想要不要把每天的QA里面带上一份战机世界的QA,因为现在(自从11月开始) 有一份专门的QA贴(类似于WOT的)。到底要不要这么干呢?

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/30

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/30/30-11-2013/
来源↗

– the objects that currently don’t stop any shells (for example telephone poles and such) will not be affected by the soft object penetration mechanism
当前版本中不能挡炮弹的物体(栗如电线杆子什么的)是不会被新的可摧毁物体击穿机制所影响的

– right now, it’s not even theoretically considered to allow shells penetrate multiple easy-to-penetrate tanks in a row (with penetration loss) (SS: a player was asking whether it is considered for example for a Object 268 shell to penetrate several MS-1 tanks in a row, destroying them all)
根本没有考虑过让炮弹可以一次性击穿若干辆易于击穿的坦克(每穿透一辆之后穿深都会衰减),理论设想都没有(SS:有一名玩家问到开发者有没有考虑过引入让268工程可以一发炮弹一次性击毁好几辆MS-1这种机制)
继续阅读

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/29

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/29/29-11-2013/
来源↗ 

– SerB states he does read the Suggestions forum (SS: on RU server), but very, very few things make sense there
SerB表示他的确会读论坛上(SS:毛服的 )的那些建议,但是只有极少数能够自圆其说 

– inner parts inertia is not included in the WoT motion model
WOT中的动态模型并没有包含内部零件的惯性
继续阅读