Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/06/6-12-2013/
来源↗
– the fact WT RhB 128mm now has a muzzle brake has no effect on its camo factor
莱茵金属武器运输车的128炮现在有了炮口制退器对它的隐蔽系数没有影响
– Chi-Ri can mount a rammer even when it has an autoloading gun (no other autoloader tank has that): this is not a mistake, SerB states that rammer is mounted on a tank independently, not tied to a gun
五式中戦車 チリ就算在使用弹夹炮的情况下都可以装一个输弹机（所有其他的弹夹炮都做不到）：这并不是一个失误，SerB表示说输弹机是独立安装在坦克上的，和炮没什么关系
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/05/5-12-2013/
来源↗
Important: Something urgent came up. Feedback to 8.10 (tests, screenshots and such) will be posted later than usual, I will do it in the night when I come back.
重要信息：我有点急事，8.10的反馈（测试，截图啥的）会比往常稍晚一些发出来，我会在我回来那天的晚上再搞的。
Something to read while the test installs. Not much though:
在等测试服安装的时候看看下面的东西吧。当然不多就是了：
继续阅读
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/4-12-2013/
来源↗
So, just a reminder, the test server is most likely tomorrow
提醒下，测试服估计明天就上线了
– there are no plans for PvE gameplay in WoT for now
现在没有要给WoT搞一个PvE游戏形式的计划
继续阅读
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/03/3-12-2013/
来源↗
An interesting thing. SerB and Storm pretty much stopped answering (busy I guess), there’s a new developer guy in the thread though (nickname Yurko2F) – his answers are less funny, but quite technical and detailed. Will try to capture it properly. Also, this guy seems to answer whining politely. He will learn…
先讲个有意思的事。SerB和Storm已经不怎么回答问题了（我估计正忙着呢），但是QA帖子里出现了一个新的开发团队的人（绰号Yurko2F）—他的答案看起来没那么有趣，但是细节部分很充实，且技术性很强。我会试图好好翻译的。 另外，这货看起来对喷子还是很有礼貌的。他会慢慢尝到……
– the “tent” in the base (the boxes and whatnot) will also be penetrable in 8.10 – it will change the base capture dynamics
基地里的那个“帐篷”（盒子和一些乱七八糟的）在8.10中也将成为可摧毁物体——它会对占家的形式有一些影响
继续阅读
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/02/2-12-2013/
来源↗
Hello everyone,
大家好
check out Listy’s article about Comet vs Tigers clash. Also, Chieftain posted a pretty interesting article on wacky British/US projects 🙂
看看Listy的关于彗星Vs虎式的文章吧。另外，Chieftain发了一篇关于英国/美国奇怪的计划的文章 🙂
Unfortunately, yesterday and today there were no developer answers whatsoever, with one exception:
不幸的是，除了以下这条之外，昨天和今天都没有任何的答复。
– there won’t be special (specific) Taiwanese crew (and other insignia etc) for Taiwanese tanks
台湾坦克不会有特殊的（或者说特有的）组员（以及其他记号）
I am thinking of including a part of daily translations specifically for WoWp QA, as there now is (since November) a dedicated QA thread (just like for WoT). Is it worth it?
我在想要不要把每天的QA里面带上一份战机世界的QA，因为现在（自从11月开始） 有一份专门的QA贴（类似于WOT的）。到底要不要这么干呢？
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/30/30-11-2013/
来源↗
– the objects that currently don’t stop any shells (for example telephone poles and such) will not be affected by the soft object penetration mechanism
当前版本中不能挡炮弹的物体（栗如电线杆子什么的）是不会被新的可摧毁物体击穿机制所影响的
– right now, it’s not even theoretically considered to allow shells penetrate multiple easy-to-penetrate tanks in a row (with penetration loss) (SS: a player was asking whether it is considered for example for a Object 268 shell to penetrate several MS-1 tanks in a row, destroying them all)
根本没有考虑过让炮弹可以一次性击穿若干辆易于击穿的坦克（每穿透一辆之后穿深都会衰减），理论设想都没有（SS：有一名玩家问到开发者有没有考虑过引入让268工程可以一发炮弹一次性击毁好几辆MS-1这种机制）
继续阅读
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/29/29-11-2013/
来源↗
– SerB states he does read the Suggestions forum (SS: on RU server), but very, very few things make sense there
SerB表示他的确会读论坛上（SS：毛服的 ）的那些建议，但是只有极少数能够自圆其说
– inner parts inertia is not included in the WoT motion model
WOT中的动态模型并没有包含内部零件的惯性
继续阅读