原帖：http://www.vbaddict.net/content/68-Hot-Hotter-Heatmaps
来自：http://www.vbaddict.net/wot.php vb站是最好的WOT数据分析网站之一
数据来源是每个图随机抽取500场 2013年8月网友自发上传到vb站的战斗录像。
暂时只有标准模式，其他模式待完成。
需要指出的是 知道vb站并时常使用vb站分析战绩的，相对来说已经是WOT的进阶类玩家
通常被上传的录像 战术指标都偏高，也就是说主视角的走位相对会更合理些。
挨蹲斯堡
继续阅读
Source: http://world-of-ru.livejournal.com/2473578.html
Upcoming German tier 9 TD
Waffenträger auf Panzer IV
6 man crew, 150mm tier 10 gun, engine tier 5
Hello everyone,
you might have seen the earlier supertest leak regarding the upcoming tier 5 tank destroyer, the Sfl.IVc. In game it will look like this.
Does it look retarded to you? Of course it does. There’s no point in creating such a huge box and putting a cannon in front. Huge silhouette would guarantee discovery. So, how come Germans built such a vehicle?
Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/04/4-9-2013/
来源↗
今天量不多，大家凑合着看
– looks like the US premium TD will possibly be only low-tier. To quote The_Chieftain: “The 122-44 is at a higher tier, where there are few US options. I would not expect a high-tier US premium TD.”
看起来那辆美国的金币TD会是一辆低级车。The_Chieftain说过（美服开发人员）：“122-44是辆高级车，但是美国的高级TD可选的车辆很少。我个人是不指望能有一辆高级美国金币TD的”
– the ST-I hull rear armor has a bug, where the collision model doesn’t correspond to the visual one (there’s more slope than there should be), it will be fixed
ST-I菊花部位的装甲有个BUG，碰撞模型和视觉模型并不一样（角度更陡一些），会得到修正的
– Storm on removing the machínegun weakspot on the Tiger II armor model: “According to the words of Hilary Doyle, German machinegun gun shields provided roughly the same level of protection as the main armor. So that’s how we’re going to slowly do it” (SS: in such a case, we can expect the removal of the other German tanks’ bow MG weakspots)
Storm对于移除虎2的机关枪孔弱点的说法：“根据Hilary Doyle的说法，德国人的机枪盾可以提供和装甲差不多等级的保护。所以那就是我们的解决办法（SS：既然已经开了个头，那么我们也能看到未来其他德国车上机枪孔的Buff）”
– the way the 6 perks/skills display (5x + 6th perk/skill) on WoT crews won’t be changed, because “there’s not enough room”
WOT现在的六技能显示方法（5x某技能+第六个技能）不会变的，因为“地方好像不够了……”
There might be more in the evening.
晚上也许还有，等吧。
来源: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/31/stb-1-japanese-tier-10-medium-tank/
Author: Soukoudragon, Daigensui
Hello everyone, today we have another article from Soukoudragon, (revised by Daigensui) this time about (sort of confirmed) Japanese tier 10 tank. Enjoy!
After the culmination of many tested core components, the STB-1 was completed in 1969. The STB-1 was the first of two development phases in the development of the Type 74. Despite its technical and rather unimposing name, the first phase was an ambitious and successful creation while the second phase was largely about taking a katana to the cost of the tank while improving endurance and reliability. The STB-1 is indeed an imposing tank and would be a very competitive tier 10 tank in World of Tanks.
Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/03/3-9-2013/
来源↗
– according to The_Chieftain, the US rebalance has been postponed from 8.9 till later
根据The_Chieftain（美服开发人员）的说法，美国线的重新平衡从预订的8.9被推迟了
– the Object 268 supposed “nerf leak” is still circulating RU forums, so once again, it’s garbage
268工程即将被砍的消息依然还在毛服流传着，所以我再重申一次，那个是假的。
– Q: “Why do you troll some questions and answers others correctly, it’s not fair!” A: “Want justice? Go to Hague tribunal.”
问：“为什么有时候你的回答是正常的，而有些时候是在婊人？”答：“想要正义吗我的朋友，海牙国际法庭欢迎你！”
– M6A2E1 HT underperforming in regular MM spread? “How terrible…”
M6A2E1重坦（金面包）在常规分房下表现太差了！ “How terrible…”
继续阅读
Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/02/2-9-2013-2/
来源↗
Today was a bit technical, so I hope I got everything right
今天的东西都是科普向的，我希望我都翻译对了……
– SerB is not afraid of WoWp stealing players from WoT, he thinks the migration will be normal
SerB并不担心战机世界的推出会降低WoT的用户数量，他觉得用户数量的转移是正常的
– SerB describing the difference between US and Soviet penetration methodology: “The difference is in the amount of shell fragments, that make it past the armor. In the common American and German system it is based on “primary penetration” (20 percent of fragments make it behind the armor), while the Soviet data are based on the “guaranteed penetration” (80 percent). We compared the data of German and American 75mm guns tested in USSR and with German 50mm, 88mm and British 57mm. There is a 1,17 times difference on average”
SerB是这么描述美国与苏联之间的穿深计算方法的：“区别就在于能够穿透装甲的弹片的数量。美国和德国的系统是基于“主要穿深”（有20%的弹片穿透了装甲），而苏联的数据是基于“确保穿深”（80%的弹片穿透了装甲）。我们对比了以下一些炮的数据：德国和美国的75mm炮，德国的50mm，88mm以及英国的57mm，在两种计算方法中大约平均有1.17倍的差距”
– SerB states that this table is not accurate, he considers the Soviet gun tests table accurate
SerB说这个表格是不准确的，他认为苏联炮的测试表格是准确的。
继续阅读
