【WOWS Q&A】2016/11/18 Part.2

发表于由
1

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/11/18/wows-qa-2-18th-november-2016/#more-36281
来源↗

Thanks to Babykim, EU
感谢欧服的Babykim

Q&A from RU dated Friday, 18 November
毛服在11月18号的QA

部分问题在之前的QA中回答过了，所以跳过了一些

Q: The Ocean map has been removed. Only maps with islands remain. I would like more open maps. Many players sit behind islands in smoke. The gameplay is static and resembles that of tank-destroyers in WoT.
问：那张大洋图被删掉了。现在游戏中的地图都带有岛屿了。我想要更多的开放式地图。现在许多玩家都在岛后面的眼里站着输出。现在的游戏体验没什么意思，而且感觉很像WOT的TD。
继续阅读 →

【WOWS Q&A】2016/11/18

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/11/18/wows-qa-18th-november-2016/#more-36276
来源↗

Q:“American ships suffer a lot under the current meta. Do you have any plans on giving them buffs to restore playability?”
问：“美国船现在玩起来很难受。你们有计划加强它们吗？”

A:On a wide scale, there are no problems with American ships in the current meta. Sure, there are individual ships that could use buffs, but that issue isn’t unique to the US tree. Their destroyers and battleships perform well, while the carriers have problems that stem more from the class than the nation. Our current priority is resolving carrier class issues before moving onto nation-specific carrier issues.
答：现在看来美国船其实是没有问题的。当然了，肯定还有那些需要Buff一下的船，但这个问题又不是只有美国树才有的。驱逐舰和战列舰现在表现不错，航母的问题更多的来自于这条线本身的问题。当前的优先事项是把航母的问题解决了， 然后再去解决其他那些每个国家才有的航母问题。

继续阅读 →

【WOWS Q&A】2016/11/14

发表于由
回复

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/11/14/wows-qa-14th-november-2016/
来源↗

Q&A from RU dated Friday, 11 November. Translated by Babykim, EU Forums.
毛服在11月11日，周五的QA。由欧服的Babykim翻译。

Q: What do you think about a “seasonal” game mode commemorating historical events, in which only ships of certain nations can participate?
问：你们觉得出一个“季节性的”庆祝历史事件的游戏模式，然后只能由特定国家进行参与的这个想法怎么样？

A: We cannot promise new game modes at this time.
答：现在并不能对新的游戏模式做出保证。

继续阅读 →