【WOWS Q&A】2016/11/18 Part.2

Source:https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2016/11/18/wows-qa-2-18th-november-2016/#more-36281
来源↗

Thanks to Babykim, EU
感谢欧服的Babykim

Q&A from RU dated Friday, 18 November
毛服在11月18号的QA

部分问题在之前的QA中回答过了,所以跳过了一些

Q: The Ocean map has been removed. Only maps with islands remain. I would like more open maps. Many players sit behind islands in smoke. The gameplay is static and resembles that of tank-destroyers in WoT.
问:那张大洋图被删掉了。现在游戏中的地图都带有岛屿了。我想要更多的开放式地图。现在许多玩家都在岛后面的眼里站着输出。现在的游戏体验没什么意思,而且感觉很像WOT的TD。

A: We have not removed the Ocean. It is still available at tiers IX and X. We balance the maps for all ship classes. There are open maps in game, such as Okinawa and Atlantic. The tank-destroyer analogy is not quite correct.
答:我们并没有移除那张大洋深处。现在开9级和10级船都可以玩到。我们平衡地图都是为了所有船型进行平衡的。现在游戏中也有开放式的地图,比如冲绳和亚特兰大。而且你那个TD的比喻也不是很对。

Q: Can we expect spectacular effects of ship detonations, with turrets flying, flash of explosions and columns of smoke?
问:船殉爆的时候能不能有观察视角,比如说炮塔飞起来啊,各种爆炸和烟雾?

A: We are already considering this idea. At the moment, we cannot say if and when such effects would be added to the game. We are currently working on a new technology for modeling special effects in the game.
答:已经在考虑了。现在的话我们还不能说到底会有什么特效被实装进游戏。我们现在正在搞一套可以建模特效的新技术。

Q: Do you plan a Japanese battleship of tiers 6-8?
问:你们有计划Buff日本6~8级的战舰吗?

A: We do, but I cannot share any release date. Please follow the official site.
答:有,但是不能分享任何细节。请关注官网。

Q: You often refer to history when rationalizing design decisions. Be consistent and give the AA capability to USS Arkansas.
问:你们在做出各种决定的时候一直都会说史实,史实的。那你们倒是史实一把,给阿堪萨斯多加点防空能力啊?

A: Let me say that only few ships at tier 4 have decent AA. The Arkansas has merits that make it different from her analogue the Wyoming. For example, six upgrade slots, which allow her to shoot further and more accurate, and be stealthier. The Arkansas has more secondaries, whereas the Wyoming more AA. So while better secondaries give the format ship an edge in close combat, the AA will not necessarily safe the latter from an air attack. Taking about historical facts, the ship is represented in its 1912 fit that did not carry AA.
答:我这么说,其他4级船很少有AA好的。阿堪萨斯现在和怀俄明相比已经有很多明显的优点了,比如6个插件槽,可以让她打的更远,打的更准,而且隐蔽也有提升。阿堪萨斯副炮更多,而怀俄明的AA更多。前者的大量副炮在近战的时候有了优势,但是后者的防空也不能保证在被空袭时的绝对安全。从史实的角度来说,游戏中的阿堪萨斯是1912年的那个没有防空炮的版本。

 

 

 

Q: Will there be Kamikazes on Japanese carriers?
问:日本航母能神风吗?

A: We do not plan introducing the Kamikazes. This was a desperate measure, taken under extreme conditions, when the technological lag and the lack of resources had a great influence on the outcome of the war, and desperate measures were necessary. In our game, the players are initially in a situation of balance, which makes the inclusion of such desperate measures pointless.
答:我们没有计划加入神风。这是一个在极端情况下由科技差距和资源不足对于战争产生了极大影响的情况下做出的绝望之举,而这种举动又是必要的。在游戏中,玩家一开始就处在一个平衡的状态下,所以神风这种举动就没有什么意义。

【WOWS Q&A】2016/11/18 Part.2》上有1个想法

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注