作者归档：生活如此傲娇

【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/03

发表于由
3

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/03/3-12-2013/
来源↗

An interesting thing. SerB and Storm pretty much stopped answering (busy I guess), there’s a new developer guy in the thread though (nickname Yurko2F) – his answers are less funny, but quite technical and detailed. Will try to capture it properly. Also, this guy seems to answer whining politely. He will learn…
先讲个有意思的事。SerB和Storm已经不怎么回答问题了（我估计正忙着呢），但是QA帖子里出现了一个新的开发团队的人（绰号Yurko2F）—他的答案看起来没那么有趣，但是细节部分很充实，且技术性很强。我会试图好好翻译的。 另外，这货看起来对喷子还是很有礼貌的。他会慢慢尝到……

– the “tent” in the base (the boxes and whatnot) will also be penetrable in 8.10 – it will change the base capture dynamics
基地里的那个“帐篷”（盒子和一些乱七八糟的）在8.10中也将成为可摧毁物体——它会对占家的形式有一些影响
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/12/02

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/02/2-12-2013/
来源↗

Hello everyone,
大家好 

check out Listy’s article about Comet vs Tigers clash. Also, Chieftain posted a pretty interesting article on wacky British/US projects 🙂
看看Listy的关于彗星Vs虎式的文章吧。另外，Chieftain发了一篇关于英国/美国奇怪的计划的文章 🙂

Unfortunately, yesterday and today there were no developer answers whatsoever, with one exception:
不幸的是，除了以下这条之外，昨天和今天都没有任何的答复。 

– there won’t be special (specific) Taiwanese crew (and other insignia etc) for Taiwanese tanks
台湾坦克不会有特殊的（或者说特有的）组员（以及其他记号） 

I am thinking of including a part of daily translations specifically for WoWp QA, as there now is (since November) a dedicated QA thread (just like for WoT). Is it worth it?
我在想要不要把每天的QA里面带上一份战机世界的QA，因为现在（自从11月开始） 有一份专门的QA贴（类似于WOT的）。到底要不要这么干呢？

8.10测试日期

发表于由
1

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/01/patch-8-10-test-date/
来源↗

Hello everyone,
大家好， 

earlier, I posted that the test server will come out on 9.12.2013 – that info (while apparently true at the time) is no longer valid. 8.10 test server will apparently come out on 5.12.2013, the patch release for EU and US is planned for 23.12.2013.
早些时候我发帖说过测试服会在2013年12月⑨日上线，那个信息（尽管在那时看来是对的）现在已经过时了。8.10的测试服将会于2013年12月5日上线，而欧服和美服的补丁正式的上线日期是2013年12月23日。

另：今天没有QA。

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/30

发表于由
1

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/30/30-11-2013/
来源↗

– the objects that currently don’t stop any shells (for example telephone poles and such) will not be affected by the soft object penetration mechanism
当前版本中不能挡炮弹的物体（栗如电线杆子什么的）是不会被新的可摧毁物体击穿机制所影响的

– right now, it’s not even theoretically considered to allow shells penetrate multiple easy-to-penetrate tanks in a row (with penetration loss) (SS: a player was asking whether it is considered for example for a Object 268 shell to penetrate several MS-1 tanks in a row, destroying them all)
根本没有考虑过让炮弹可以一次性击穿若干辆易于击穿的坦克（每穿透一辆之后穿深都会衰减），理论设想都没有（SS：有一名玩家问到开发者有没有考虑过引入让268工程可以一发炮弹一次性击毁好几辆MS-1这种机制）
继续阅读 →

日系超级重坦

发表于由
5

请尊重劳动成果，转载请注明出处及作者。
Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/
来源↗

Probably the most famous Japanese heavy tank is the O-I, a 120 ton multi-turreted gargantuan monstrosity. There is something appealing to it to say the least. But maybe it was actually 140 tons. There reflects the difficulty about this tank.
日系最出名的重坦大概就是O-I了，一个120吨多炮塔的钢铁怪兽。 总的来说，它还是挺有意思的。但是也许它真实的重量是140吨。重量上的差异反映了这个坦克所遭遇的重重困难。

To get started, I find it might be helpful to draw out the full extent of Japanese heavies. It could help put things in perspective. So real quickly, here is a list of all Japanese heavy tanks possible for WoT with a few handy facts for each. All are multi turreted except for the noted Heavy X which I do not know anything about. Armor is listed in a front/side/rear format if the numbers are available. Otherwise just the maximum armor is given. The 100 ton and the O-I will be discussed afterwards.
首先，我发现把日系整条重坦线都搞出来有助于大家对重坦的理解。 这样从宏观角度看起来就会有些帮助。所以以下是所有可以塞进WOT的日系重坦，顺便带了一些它们的数据。所有坦克都是多炮塔车辆，除了那辆我一无所知的X重坦。装甲是以正/侧/后的形式列出的（单位均为毫米——译注），当然是在能找到数据的前提下。否则只会列出最厚装甲数据。那辆百吨和O-I坦克稍后再讨论。
继续阅读 →

【Developer Q&A 】2013/11/29

发表于由
回复

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/29/29-11-2013/
来源↗ 

– SerB states he does read the Suggestions forum (SS: on RU server), but very, very few things make sense there
SerB表示他的确会读论坛上（SS：毛服的 ）的那些建议，但是只有极少数能够自圆其说 

– inner parts inertia is not included in the WoT motion model
WOT中的动态模型并没有包含内部零件的惯性
继续阅读 →