Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/23/23-10-2013/
来源↗
For all those interested in modelling (real life modelling, like plastic tank kits), Revell is offering its products with World of Tanks codes inside. Pretty neat.
那些对模型感兴趣的人们（苏联模型，比如坦克啥的），↗链接在卖一些带WOT用的CDKEY的坦克模型，有兴趣可自行前往。（注：网页为德文）
Also, the first FTR QA test was not successful: the questions were not replied for some reason, but the player was not banned, so no rules were broken. Will run a second test.
还有，FTR的第一次QA测试并不成功：那些问题由于某些原因没有被回答， 但是玩家也没有被Ban掉，所以我们没有触犯什么规则。我会进行第二次实验的
– there is no special MM for platoons
组队没有特殊的分房
– the D-83 gun is not planned for World of Tanks (SS: Soviet experimental gun projected for IS-3, if I recall correctly with like 380mm pen)
WOT没有要把D-83这杆炮做进游戏的计划（SS：苏联准备给IS-3装上的炮，如果我没记错的话穿深大概在380mm左右）
– Soviet “konisch” type squeeze bore guns (for example the S-40 with 76-57mm) are not planned
苏联的“Konisch（圆锥形）” 锥膛炮（例如S-40的76/57mm炮）暂时不在计划列表当中
– apparently, the ARL-44 armor and engine horsepower are correct in game, wikipedia (SS: well, at least the Russian one) has it wrong
游戏内的ARL-44的装甲和马力是正确的，维基百科（SS：起码俄罗斯的那个）是错的
– WoWp won’t apparently have plans with 80-100mm guns
战机世界没有要做80mm~100mm炮的计划
– SerB states that the autoloader vehicles implementation in WoT is okay
SerB表示把弹夹炮引入WOT没什么问题
– the number reload timer in 8.9 is not based on any mod, it was made from scratch
8.9中的装填倒计时并不是基于任何MOD所做的，而是完全从头开始搞的
– more functions, allowed by mods (SS: for example custom healthbars and such) do not appear in the game because their usefulness is “questionable”. When asked, who decides what is questionable, SerB replies that WoT is not a democracy and the developers decide what is useful and what is not
MOD带来的一些新功能（SS：例如自定义血条以及种种）没有出现在游戏内的原因是他们的实用程度“值得怀疑”。当被问起到底谁决定这些东西是否“值得怀疑”时，SerB表示WOT不是皿煮制的，开发团队会决定哪些（功能）是有用的，而哪些不是
– XP gain when someone else is scouting: when damage done is equal, both TD/tanks and arty get the same amount of XP
在有人帮你点亮的时候，由于伤害而得到的经验计算如下：当造成等量伤害时，TD，轻中重以及火炮获得的经验是一样多的
– there are no camo mechanism changes in 8.9
8.9没有隐蔽机制的改动
– there is a small XP bonus for surviving a battle, but SerB states it’s not much
在战斗中幸存下来有一点XP加成，但是SerB表示加成不是很多
– there is already a rough concept for the European tech tree, but it’s very premature, SerB states that it is analogical a bit to the way Chinese tanks added (SS: as in, there are some local versions of existing tanks, just like China has for example the Chinese Chi-Ha)
欧洲线的基础概念已经有了，但是还非常不成熟。SerB表示欧洲线和加入中国线坦克的方式很相似（SS：也就是说，会有部分的确在该国存在的车辆，例如天朝的雷诺NC-31）
– according to SerB, the F1 turret and not the prototype turret was picked for ARL-44, because there were very little differences between this turret and the regular one
SerB表示ARL-44用的是F1的炮塔而不是如下图所示的实验型炮塔的原因是这个炮塔和一般的炮塔区别不大
– price of a shell is not determined by the shell power apparently (SS: that’s why the Chinese 122mm HEAT shells were not made cheaper, even though their penetration was nerfed)
炮弹价格并不是根据弹药的威力决定的（SS：这就是为什么中国的122mm HEAT弹虽然遭到了Nerf，但是价格没有下降的原因）
– there is already a concept how to handle the European tech tree crews, it will be disclosed when the time is right
欧洲线组员的问题已经有了一个初步的解决概念，会在合适的时间公开的
– apparently, there will be no special permanent reward for the best damage dealer of the losing team in randoms (as an improvement to the “courageous resistance”)
不会有给随机战斗的败队中输出最高的人的奖励的（相对于“虽败犹荣”这个奖励机制而言的）
– there will be at least one more patch in 2013 apart from 8.9
年内除了8.9以外还会至少有一个补丁