Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/03/type-59patton-hybrid-fake-or-real.html
来源↗

Hello warriors,
大家嚎， 

recently, it was leaked that the Chinese tree would get a new tier 8 premium tank, a Type 59 hull with Patton turret. Naturally, given how ridiculous this thing is, most people simply assumed it’s a fake from “SerB’s design bureau” (and a bad one at that). But is it really?
前两天有说过中国线要出一辆新的8级金币车，用的是59式的车身和巴顿的炮塔。当然了，鉴于这东西听上去就这么蠢，很多人就会以为这个是“SerB制造局”制造的。但是事实果真如此吗？

To find out, we contacted the best person for such question – Wargaming’s very own historian, Yuri Pasholok. He confirmed that the vehicle is “real” – in a way.
为了探究真相，我们联系到了能够回答这个问题的最适合的人—WG自己的历史学家，Yuri Pasholok。他确认说这辆车是“真的”—从某种意义上来说是的。

As you probably know, China has some very specific laws and it is for this reason that the Chinese server is completely independent. In return, the Chinese server operator, a company called Konzhong pays Wargaming license fees and also provides some information on Chinese vehicles.
各位也许都知道，中国有着相应的法律法规，所以国服是独立于其他服务器之外的。（译注：国外公司不得在中国境内运营游戏，必须经过一层代理商，例如暴雪→网易→魔兽这样的关系）作为运营的回报呢，空中网就会付给WG一些许可费，并且提供一些关于中国坦克的信息。

And here’s the issue. Pretty much nothing coming out of Konzhong is verifiable in western sources, so stuff like T-34-1, T-34-2, 112, 113… all these could theoretically be fake. They were given to Wargaming simply as a DVD with a bunch of drawings (no historical documents or anything, just drawings) with descriptions and designations.
问题就出在这里。空中网这边提供的东西在西方的资料来源中基本都是不可考的，所以像T-34-1，T-34-2，112，113这些……理论上来说都有可能是虚构的。WG收到的这些车的资料只是一张DVD，还有一堆图纸（没有历史文献什么的，只有图纸），附带了一些描述和参数（装甲的参数）

The Type 59/Patton hybrid is exactly this case as well. It comes from Kongzhong without any photo or proof. According to the Chinese, this project didn’t exist other than as a proposal – it was a product of the “thawing” of relations between USA and China and never went anywhere, as it was significantly flawed from early on (the turret rings don’t match and there is no real reason to put a Patton turret on Type 59, it’s not like it is better or anything). Chinese “favorite” method of explaining absence of any documents is that the “prototype was destroyed during nuclear trials”, so if something like this appears in the description… well, we’ll just have to see.
而这个59/巴顿合体的东西就恰恰是这种情况。这信息也是空中网提供的，而且没有任何照片或者证明的支持。根据中方的说法，这辆车只是过去的一个提议而已—这是因为过去美国和中国的关系“融冰”之后的产物，而且这个计划也只停留在提议阶段，因为从一开始就有一些重大问题（炮塔圈对不上，而且把巴顿的脑袋插在59身上也没什么意义，因为这比原来的也好不到哪去）。中方对于任何没有文献支持的产物的最“惯用”的说法是“原型车在核试验的时候被毁掉了”，所以要是这样的文字真的出现在车辆描述中的话…………哎，各位等着看吧。 

译注：根据可靠消息表示，这辆车的确是二雷自己找人“发明”的产物………………具体不多说了，大家心里都有数