【Developer Q&A 】2014/01/27

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/27/27-1-2014/
来源↗

Hey guys, check out Listy’s article about one special German pilot!
记得去看看Listy的关于一位特殊的德国飞行员的文章! 

You can also check The_Chieftain’s “Hatch” on Firefly real life tests…
还有要去看看The_Chieftain的关于萤火虫在现实生活中的测试的文章

Part 1
Part 2

– for now it is not planned to change vehicle characteristics between random battles and upcoming historical battles (SS: as in, if you have a Panzer IV in certain setup, its characteristics will be the same in both modes, if you use the same modules)
现在没有计划要把车辆的属性在随机战和即将出现的历史战中做成不同的(SS:也就是说,假如你有一辆使用特定设置的4号,它的属性在随机战和历史战中会是一的,前提是你要使用一样的模块)
 

– the recent interface upgrades were not done earlier, because “other interface works had to be completed before”
最近对于界面的改动没有在更早的时候完成的原因是“其他界面工作需要在之前完成”

– the probability of causing minimum and maximum damage is not linear – there is a lower chance to cause extreme end damage and higher chance to cause average damage.
能够造成最大伤害和最小伤害的可能性并不是线性的—打出极限伤害的可能性比较低,而造成均伤的可能性比较高

– regarding one nation being better than other in “national battles”: “A nation as a whole isn’t worse, actual tanks are. These tanks will be fixed, if necessery”
说到某个国家在国别战比其他国家要好的问题:“一个国家作为整体来看不是很烂,但是那些坦克很烂。如果有必要的话,我们会对坦克进行调整。”

– (SS: in 8.11, the teamkill and teamdamage bans will be much harsher) – regarding the fear of unjust bans for random hits, SerB states: “We will not ban for random hits on allies”
(SS:在8.11中,TK和击伤队友的惩罚(封号)更加严格了)—提到不小心一炮打飞打到队友身上这种随机事件的发生,SerB表示:“我们不会Ban掉造成这些随机事件的玩家的”

– Storm states regarding the differences between gaps between roadwheels on T-54, Type 59 and WZ-120 in 8.11 that they are different hulls, these gaps don’t have to be the same
Storm表示对于T-54,59式和WZ-120的负重轮之间的间距不一样的问题他表示这些车使用的是不同的车身,这些间距也就不一定要一样大了

– Storm states there will be no compensations for Type 59 changes
Storm表示对于59式的改动不会有补偿

– Type 59 was changed “so that the tanks based on T-54 were done correctly”
59式的改动是为了“让那些基于T-54所做的坦克都正确的出现在游戏内”

– the T-54 in the game from 8.11 will be “early hull variant”
8.11中的T-54的车身是“早期车身的变种版”

– IS-3 mantlet was not changed (SS: some player was complaining it is now too easy to penetrate)
IS-3的炮盾没有改动(SS:部分玩家在抱怨现在太容易穿了) 

Funnily enough, a player submitted his “M6A2E1 sucks” whine in verses. SerB’s only answer was “Not a Pushkin”
有意思的是,有个玩家以诗歌的形式表达了自己的“M6A2E1太烂了”的抱怨意见,SerB唯一的回复是“你又不是普希金”

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注