Source：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/01/ftr-qa-2-answers/
来源↗
Hello everyone,
小喷友们大家好，
here are the answers from the last session. As usual, I changed the wording of the original questions to make them more comprehensible – but the merit is still there I think.
这是上次你们提出的问题的答案。像以前一样，我把原来的问题其中的词换了一下， 让他们更易于理解—不过问题的原意还是在那的。
1. Is it possible for battle results (debriefing) screens to be saved into replays? If so, how high a priority does this have?
1.有可能把战斗结果（战报）的截图存进战斗录像中嘛？如果有可能的话，优先度是多高？
This won’t be touched for now. We are working on server replays. (Storm)
现在先不搞这个。我们还在搞服务器端回放来着。（Storm）
2. We know the developers are thinking of high-level (tier 10) content, similiar to 7/42 battles. But are there are plans for any low level content, based on the same principle? (7 players, tier 4-6 maximum as an example)
2.我们都知道开发团队在考虑一个高级车（10级车）的玩法，与现在的7/42很像，但是有没有任何基于同样理念，但是给低级车玩的计划？（举个栗子，7人，4~6级）这样
There are no plans for such content. (Storm)
没有要搞这样的东西的计划（Storm）
3. The French and the Chinese currently have their light branches up to tier 8 and we know there are such plans for the Germans (RU251) and Americans, while the Soviets have only “paper” tanks for those tiers. What about the Japanese and the British – are there any hightier candidates for the light tank branch?
法国和中国的轻坦线都有8级车了，而德国人也有一样的计划（RU251），美国人也有，然而苏联在那些等级上只有图纸车。日系和英国会怎么样呢—有没有适合高阶轻坦线的候选车辆？
We haven’t found yet any fitting Japanese or British tanks. If we find data, we will implement tanks. (Storm)
我们还没找到任何适用于英国和日系线的坦克。如果我们找到了数据，我们会把他们加入游戏的（Storm）
Cannoneer explains this issue further:
Cannoneer更进一步地解释了：
The most powerful light tank of the Imperial Army (eg. until 1945) is the Ke-Ho, that we will have on tier 4. Many know already, that there will be Type 61 (first mass-produced Japanese post-war tank) and STA-1 (first Type 61 prototype) in the release tree. Before STA-1, there were technical requirements issued for a 20 ton tank with 76mm gun and after that for a 25 ton tank with 90mm gun – and after that the weight was increased to 30 tons because of the thicker armor. That means there is some potential, but unfortunately we don’t have information about the projects, that were presented by the company as an answer to the requirements. One player on the US forums collected all that is known at this moment about those projects here.
日本皇军的最厉害的轻坦（到1945年止）是<五式軽戦車 ケホ> ，也就是现在的4级车。大家也早就从发布的科技树中知道会有61式坦克（日本战后第一辆量产的坦克），以及STA-1（61式的第一辆原型车）。在STA-1前面，曾经有在技术上要求过一辆用76mm炮的25吨坦克，以及在（STA-1）之后的一辆用90mm炮的25吨坦克—由于装甲变厚了的问题，重量在后来被增加到30吨。这就意味着有（高级轻坦出现的）可能性，但是不幸的是我们没有关于那些计划的数据，而且我们是以公司的名义出面去寻找这些数据的。一名美服论坛的玩家已经收集到了所有有关这个计划的信息，点我。
For Britain, there are two potential candidates. First is the A46/FV301. A46 is a project from 1943 to replace the Stuart and Chaffee with something carrying the 77mm gun (the same Comet has). FV301 is the development of the A46 project. Unfortunately, there are no drawings found for A46 yet.
而英国有两辆候选车辆，第一辆是A46/FV301。A46是1943年起的一个用来替代霞飞以及斯图尔特的计划。他们想造出一个抗77mm炮的（和流星的那杆炮一样）什么东西。FV301是A46计划的开发版。不幸的是我们没有找到任何关于A46的图纸。
The second is the light tank project by Vickers-Armstrong from 1960 (Vickers Design No. 45569 T), armed with the same gun as the Centurion (20pdr), but two times lighter. The development of this project led to the Vickers MBT. Again, there are no drawings of this tank yet.
第二辆轻坦是由1960年的维克斯-阿姆斯特朗所提出的（维克斯 第45569T号设计），抗一杆和百夫长一样的炮（20磅炮），但是要轻上两倍。这个计划的开发板就是维克斯MBT。但是我们依然没找到任何关于这辆坦克的图纸。
4. Are there any plans to implement player activated skills or perks for the crew?
有没有任何要引入玩家手动开启的组员技能的计划？
No, there are no such plans.
没有这样的计划。
5. Is it planned to increase the visual customization of vehicles, like adding of achievement markers, extra toolboxes, sandbags and the like, if so, could we expect that feature possibly next year?
有要增加车辆视觉上的自定义性的计划，类似于增加一些成就标识，额外的工具箱，沙包以及什么的吗？如果有的话，明年能不能搞出来？
Completely possible. But I will not reveal the details yet. (Storm)
完全有可能。但是我现在不告诉你们细节。（Storm）
6. On several meetings with EU British tank expert Challenger, it was openly said that the current British tier 10 medium tank FV4202 is not historical and that the armor was much worse in real life. Will the FV4202 see any changes, aside from the possible 20 pounder stock gun? Specifically, bringing the armor to historical parameters and replacing it with something else.
在与欧洲的英国坦克专家Challenger的几次会面上，曾经公开表示过现在的英国10级中坦FV4202不符合历史，而且装甲在现实生活中要比游戏内差很多。FV4202会得到除了白板的20磅炮之外的任何改动吗？而且我要特别指出装甲数据还原历史，然后拿别的什么东西替换它。
Yes, we are thinking about that question and adding the 20pdr gun as the stock gun on current tier 10 tank will be only a half-hearted solution, influencing balance.
没错，我们在考虑这个问题。但是把20磅炮作为白板炮装在现在的10级车上只是一个缺乏热情，且影响平衡的解决办法罢了。
7. Is there a chance to see the Chieftain tank (prototype) in 2014?
在2014年有机会看到酋长坦克（原型车）吗？
There is a chance, but our only guess for now is first half of 2014
有的，但是现在的推测是2014年的上半年
8. The multiturret mechanism: if it is implemented, will it be possible to unlock secondary gun modules too? (for example, M3 Lee upgrading both the 75mm and the 37mm turret gun separately)
关于多炮塔机制：假如真的引入了，有没有解锁第二杆炮的模块的可能性？（例如M3李分开解锁两杆炮，75mm和37mm的）
Yes, definitely.
绝对有可能。
9. Can we expect to see South American tanks in the game at some point?
我们是否能期待下游戏中会出现南美的坦克？
Yes, one way or another they will appear. (SerB)
他们会以某种形式出现的（SerB）
10. Has the fate of the S-Tank been decided yet, given its complicated suspension and aiming system?
S-坦克的命运决定了没有， 尤其是它那复杂的悬挂以及瞄准系统？
For now, we don’t plan to implement it. All’s fine with the Swedes even without this tank. (SerB) (as in, Swedish branch is filled)
现在没有要引入这些它的计划。瑞典线就算没这车也没问题的。（SerB）（也就是说，瑞典线早就搞定了）
11. Will you add tanks and proposed tank designs from 1900 – 1921? Like the Motorgeschütz (Burstyn tank), British Mark series, Saint-Chamond and A7V?
你们会加入1900~1921年期间被开发和被建议的坦克吗？例如 Motorgeschütz（市区坦克），英国的Mark系列坦克， 圣沙蒙以及A7V？
For now there are no plans for that, but principially it’s possible. (SerB)
现在没有这样的计划，但是理论上是可能的（SerB）
12. Is there a plan to implement an American premium tank destroyer? Is there any (even vague) ETA other than KTTS? (this is a very popular question)
有没有要引入美国金币TD的计划？就算给个模糊的日期也行啊（这个问题问的人很多）
With high probability next year.
在明年出现的可能性很大
13. Do skill bonuses such as improved ventilation or the commander bonus have any effect on the Jack of All Trades skill effects? For instance, if the commander fills in for one crew member, will this virtual crew member always be 50% trained, regardless of ventilation, etc?
通风什么的以及车长带来的技能加成对多面手技能有效果没？ 栗如，如果车长接替了另一个组员的位置，这个“虚拟的”组员是否一直是保持50%的情况，而不会计算通风之类带来的加成？
Yes, all bonuses apply.
是的，全部生效。
14. A very common question: from previous communication with developers, we know that the developers will not be banning “troll platoons” (for example one tier 10 tank platooning with two tier 1 tanks) – could we please hear the official reason, why are such platoons allowed, because many feel they bring nothing to the game and are a destructive element only.
一个问了很多次的问题：根据以前和开发团队的交流来看，我们知道开发团队没有要Ban掉“大车带小车”的计划（10级车带两个一级车）—我们能不能听到一个官方的，为什么不Ban掉这些组队的理由。因为许多人觉得他们除了给游戏带来一种毁灭性的感觉以外就没什么作用了
Such a platoon is compensated by other vehicles on the team being stronger compared to the opponent. Battles consisting of only tier 10 tanks (with the inclusion of Chaffee and tier 8 light tanks with 12 battletier) are insignificantly few. (SerB)
这样的队伍是由本队车辆比对面车辆要强的形式来补偿的。只有10级车（包括了霞飞以及其他战斗等级为12的8级轻坦）的战斗是非常少的。（SerB）
15. The developers talked about server-side replays – if that happens, does this mean the replays will be compatible with old versions?
开发人员以前提到了服务器端的回放—如果真的搞定了的话，这是不是意味着以前的录像也能被兼容了？
No. The versions will be incompatible the same way (as it is), since the content, on which the replays are viewed is in changing (maps first and foremost). (Storm)
不行。版本依然像现在一样是不能互相兼容的（就像现在一样），因为录像的内容（服务器端）是一直在变动的（比如说地图这个大头）（Storm）
16. Will they extend the friends list so that you can have several friends there?
会不会增长好友列表，让我们再多交几个朋友？
Yes. The next chat version the contact list will be made longer and improved. (Storm)
会的。下一个版本的聊天系统的联系人名单会变的更长，而且有一些改进（Storm）
17. Is there a possibility of low and high velocity ammunition for artillery being introduced in the future as an option? (So an artillery player must choose whether to fire a high velocity shell with flat curve, or “lob” a low velocity shell under high angle, allowing him to reach behind obstacles better, but sacrificing the velocity)
有没有给火炮引入一个可以选择弹药速度的选项？（火炮玩家就要选择是发射速度快但是抛物线很平，亦或是“高吊”一颗慢速炮弹，但是角度极高，可以让他更好的打到障碍物后的目标，但是要付出速度作为代价）
Maybe in the future, when we reach the artillery balance point we desire with current simple rules.
以后也许会有的吧，等我们什么时候要再平衡火炮的时候
18. I understand that the current 8.9 new German TD line is set for now, but I’m curious however what led to the choice of the Waffentrager E-100 as the top-tier, versus – say – the Waffentrager Panther in its various proposed forms (such as the Rheinmetall’s “Skorpion”, see Doyle and Spielberger’s work). The transition to the much larger and heavily armored (hull) E-100 seems jarring given the progression and playstyle of the line.
我理解8.9的新德国TD线已经定型了，但是我很好奇到底是什么让开发团队决定把百运作为顶级车，而不是—呃—黑豹武器运载车的其他版本（例如莱茵金属的“蝎子”，参照Doyle和斯皮尔伯格的工作成果）。 从（前面的车）过渡到一辆又大，车身防护更好的E-100看起来像是整条线里的不和谐音一样。
Scorpion is not strong enough for tier 10. No way. The point of the E-100 is the fact it can mount more powerful and heavier AA system without such a loss of mobility like the Maus has. And you can’t mount anything more powerful than the tier 9 normal 128mm on the Panther chassis. (SerB)
蝎子作为10级车还有点不够。恩，没门。之所以选用E-100是因为它可以在不损失机动的情况下，安装威力更大且更重的防空系统，而不像鼠式一样。而且你在黑豹底盘上没办法装上任何比9级常规128mm炮更强的玩意了。（SerB）
19. Was it ever or is it considered for very good players (with “good” being defined by Wargaming-picked criteria such as winrate) to recieve visual rewards for their mastery (new camouflage, possibly a reward tank in extreme cases) as an incentive to “learn to play better”?
是否考虑过给非常好的玩家（“好”的准则是由WG定下来的标准，例如胜率什么的）发放一些虚拟奖品，以表彰他们对游戏的精通程度（新的迷彩，极端点说，一辆新坦克什么的）以刺激大家“要学会好好玩游戏呀！”？
Such rewards were considered. For now, this will not be implemented because of the possible “toxicity” of bad players. (SerB)
曾经有过这样的计划。但是现在不会加入这样的机制，因为这对那些不太好的玩家可能是一剂“毒药”（SerB）
20. Storm wrote recently that he expects a break between the Japanese tanks and any new tanks added after them. Does this break also concern (subjectively highly requested) French tanks (second heavy line) – or, specifically, when it comes to tanks added after the Japanese, how high a priority do the French heavies have?
Storm近来表示他想在日系线和后面的新车之间留一个空档。这个空档是否也关系到（提问者的主观性极强）法国车（第二条中坦线）—或者说的再细点，在日系线后面的坦克， 法国重坦的优先度有多高？
For now we won’t comment on tank plans. There are many changes. (Storm)
现在我们对各种坦克计划不予置评。会有许多变化的。（Storm）