Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2016/02/03022016-q.html
来源↗

Hello,
大家嚎，

have another Slava Q&A for you and first of all I’m glad to see you enjoying this content and that you likeSlava, he is indeed a cool guy like I’ve read you commenting. 🙂
This time I not only gathered questions from the comment section but also from emails and even reddit, do keep on sending them in.
给各位准备了另一份Slava的QA，首先我还是要感谢各位很喜欢这种形式，也很喜欢Slava这个人。他的确是很COOOOOOOOOOOOL，而且他也一直有在读回复。
这次的问题不仅是从评论区选的，还有从邮件和Reddit当中选出来的，所以请大家继续提出各种问题。

For Russian blogs/pages who wrote this:
部分毛子的博客/网页提到了以下这一段话：

“Конкретных решений по улучшению балансировщика сейчас нет, но разработчики рассматривают разные дополнительные варианты, такие как балансировка по огневой мощности, хитпоинтам и да же скилу игрока в какой-то степени, но это все в планах.”
(The text above says that WG plans to balance tanks according to their firepower, hitpoints and player skill)
（在说WG有计划要根据坦克的火力，血量和玩家水平来进行平衡）

– Skill based balance will NEVER happen and Slava has never talked about hp/firepower based balance.
永远不会有水平分房，Salaba也从来没有说过要基于血量/火力来进行平衡

Again, don’t be afraid of contacting me to clarify things, don’t be thick headed please!
还有就是请各位不要害羞，请多发邮件来和我确认事情，别冥顽不顾就行了！

Here it is:
以下QA正文：

On the JP100 whine – they plan to nerf it!!111
我要开始抱怨百突了—他们要砍百突！！！111

-We don’t, reducing alpha dmg is not always a nerf, T-34-85 at tier6 with 100mm gun was horrible, with 85mm it’s the best medium.
我们没计划啊，再说降低单发伤害又不一定是削弱，6级的T-34-85用100mm炮的时候就很垃圾，而换上了85mm就是最强中坦了

Q: Is there a chance that we will see the M60A1 introduced into the tech tree for the USA, to help update it a bit to a current standard of other nations with vehicles from the 1960’s (T-62A, Leopard 1, AMX-30B, ect.). As well as make the US tier 10 medium competitive with other nations.
问：M60A1有没有可能实装，因为其他国家现在看起来都有1960年代的车了（T-62A，豹I，AMX-30B什么的），美国也应该跟上这个标准才是。还有就是得让美国的10级中坦和其他国家的一样具有竞争力才行。

-Not A1:)) smth else, I really want to improve US med line.
A1不会实装)，但是会实装别的，我真的很想增强一下美国中坦线

Q: Is there an option to get the MERDC pattern added for the USA vehicles, or an early variant of it like the MASSTER pattern (AKA 7th Army Camo), if not 1 MERDC pattern per environment.
问：有没有可能可以给美国车实装MERDC的迷彩样式，或者是早期版本，比如说MASSTER样式（也有叫第七军迷彩的），如果这都不成的话那就每个环境下实装一个MERDC的迷彩样式也行。
译注：所谓MERDC样式（US Mobility Equipment Research & Design Command）（美国机动装备研究与设计指挥部）是他们在70年代为美军车辆开发的一种通用迷彩守则。包括每一辆坦克的通用迷彩样式。迷彩一共有12中可选的颜色（但是每辆坦克最多只会同时拥有4种），而坦克的作战地区和外界条件会决定到底是在什么部位上涂上什么样的颜色。假如天气有变或者是坦克要被派去其他地区作战的话，只需要换掉几个颜色就可以了。
下文中提到的所有颜色均为联邦标准595a色，如果有做模型需要的话请参照http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/colorcharts/colorcharts_2.asp

附MERDC12色代码：37038（黑色），34102（也有说是34082的，暗绿色），30279（沙漠沙色，与30277不同），30099（土棕色），30117（土红色），30257（也有说是33245的，土黄色），30118（也有说33105的，土褐色），34079（森林色），34151（浅绿色），34087（也有说34088的，橄榄棕），30277（沙漠色），37875（白色）

MASSTER则是另一回事，MASSTER相当于美军的测试人员，会测试各种各样的材料以及想法。而MASSTER迷彩样式也是他们测试对象之一。该迷彩样式只包含四种颜色，分别是底色的30277（沙漠色）, 30117（土红色）, 34127（绿色）以及37038（黑色）。然而34127并不是美国涂装用的标准色，但是其颜色与34151很像。

-No idea about that, TBH
说老实话我不知道

How about taking away RNG from shell pen and damage? It would make this game competitively sound to a point and will be esports viable, as of now there is too much RNG for anyone to call themselves “professional players” of WoT.
把弹药的穿深和伤害上面的RNG移除掉怎么样？如果这样的话WOT就可以十分充分的说已经可以准备好进行电竞活动了，因为现在游戏中的随机元素太多，想说自己是“专业WOT玩家”都不行

-I’ll look into that.
我会调查下的

What happened to the other supertest tanks like the Steyr WT and the Rhm. Skorpion?
斯泰尔武器运输车和莱茵金属蝎式这种超测车都怎么样了？

-We’ll use them in 2016 at some point.
2016年的某个时间点会用掉的

Personally, I don’t get why everyone is chomping at the bit to nerf the T110E5. Why not keep the new machine gun turret as-is? It still has other weak spots to be exploited. From what I can gather, getting that armor buff now allows it to act as a real heavy on the battlefield.
我个人是不懂为什么大家抓住削弱了T110E5这一点不放。为什么不把新的机枪塔做的和旧的一样呢？反正这辆车弱点又不知这一个。我所收集到的信息是如果装甲真的Buff一下的话这车就真的是重坦了。

-E5 will not be kept as it is, no chance to avoid nerf – it is simply the best heavy AND the best US T10 medium (it has more fire power and survivability than an M48A1 while comparable on mobility) defacto at the moment.  That might be not the armor nerf tho, mobility nerf is another option, or some other option
E5不会和现在一样，肯定会被削弱—它现在不仅是最好的重坦，同时也是最好的美国10级中坦（和M48A1相比，机动性差不多，而火力和生存能力更强）。但是我们不一定会削弱装甲，我们可以削弱机动，或者砍砍别的。

Could you ask what will become of super high alpha tanks like jaegeroo, waffen and death star? I hope they get slightly nerfed in a way…
你能问下那些单发超高的车，比如百突啊，WT E-100啊，FV215b（183）都会怎么样吗？我是很希望看到他们被稍微削弱一下的……

-JP100 will be fine, less alpha, more gun comfort, the tank concept is sound and I don’t want to nerf it. WT100 will be replaced. 183mm guns will be reworked with new HESH.
百突没问题，单发会降，炮控会提升。这个坦克的想法不错，我不希望削弱它。WT E-100会被替换掉。新的HESH弹出来以后会重制183mm炮的。

ALSO chinese tds???? Type 89! HEHEHE (imo chinese tanks need a buff)
中国的TD呢？89式（此处应有笑声）（还有就是我觉得中国车需要Buff一下）

-Yes, medium line and some of the HTs and LTs need help.
是，中坦线和部分重坦和轻坦的确是要Buff。

“The two answers regarding map rotation and  corridors”
“关于地图轮换和绞肉图的两个回答”

-We need to remove shitty maps, including low tier maps, Mittengard!
我们需要移除那些垃圾地图，包括低级的那个天坑！

-We will change maps, starting with removal of corridor ones.
我们会对地图进行改动的，首先是移除掉绞肉图

In my opinion, this wouldn’t leave much maps untouched in the process.
我个人的看法是如果真这么改那没多少图不会被改动了

-Yes, too many bad maps, I don’t want to keep them.
没错，烂图太多了，我也不想要这些图。

Q: Wouldn’t it be better to redo maps first, with all the new insights you have been given over the past year, instead of taking the blunt approach like mentioned in answer two?
问：那这样的话是不是先用过去这一年中的各种想法做一批新的图，而不是慢吞吞的像上面说的一样改图？

-Takes too long compared to “by fire be purged”. Seriously, Stalingrad is soo bad it’s easier and cheaper to make a new one.
我跟你说，这比“被火焰净化吧”需要的时间还要长。不开玩笑，斯大林格勒这图太烂了，以至于弄个新图反而比较方便。
译注：被火焰净化吧！（By拉格纳罗斯）

“How about just decreasing the damage of prem. ammo by 50% .<snip>”
“把金币弹的伤害砍掉50%怎么样（后略）”

-No.  Rebalancing prem ammo is okay tho. Things like 420 pen HEAT will have to go away.
不行，但是重新平衡金币弹是可以的。420穿的HEAT必须消失。

Q’s: Can Slava explain on this? It is a bit contradicting to read ‘no’ followed by ‘re-balancing prem ammo is okay’. What did he have in mind, what direction?
In which direction should we, us players, be thinking in regards to your vision on how this is could be rebalanced?Ó
问：Slava能解释下吗？先说不行，但是又说可以重新平衡金币弹这两点好像有矛盾啊。他到底在想什么？
还有就是我们玩家到底要通过什么样的观点来考虑这个问题？

-Reduction of dmg of premium ammo? I don’t like the idea of ruining premium ammo, that’s what these “let’s nerf gold dmg by 30-50%” questions are – some people ask us to take away gold ammo one way or another. Gold ammo for silver is important part of game economy.
降低金币弹的伤害？我个人是不喜欢这种会彻底摧毁金币弹这个概念的改动的，这就是为什么我对那些“把金币弹的伤害砍个30~50%吧”的问题一律都是说不的。有人要我们想办法把金币弹弄掉。但是拿银币买金币弹已经成为了游戏经济系统的一个重要部分。

So the idea is that premium ammo is a better ammo. Does better always mean more penetration?  No, it doesn’t.
所以现在的想法是金币弹是一种更加好的弹药。但是这一定就意味着穿深更高吗？并不是的。

Options:
几条路可以走：

More pen or more dmg or faster speed or more crits or…there are many options.
For example, Su100Y already has different gold ammo – more dmg one. For some tanks we can go that way, why not?
穿深上升，或者是弹速更快，或者是可以更加简单的摧毁模块—而且还不止这些。你看，SU-100Y已经有了不同的金币弹了—伤害提高的金币弹。部分坦克的话的确是可以这么改，你提个反对意见？

 I want to suggest 2things
我提两个建议

1.durring the European community contributer thing (Cyprus meeting), the question of testing tanks came out, but no one from wg or YouTube knew how to implement it. I came up with the idea of lending tanks. I want their opinion on this. I got alot of good feedback from players on the thread.
1.在欧洲社群贡献者会议中（赛普留斯会议），有人提出了关于测试坦克的事情。但是WG和Youtube视频作者都不知道要怎么实装这套系统才好。我提出了租借坦克的想法。我想听听WG是怎么想的，因为在我那个帖子中有很多很多优秀的反馈意见。

-Lending? Not sure what you mean. I know how to test tanks. 🙂
租借？我不懂你是什么意思。我反正是知道要怎么测试坦克的

We need a public test realm which is almost always on and we can test new tanks or features there, the way WoW does that.
我们需要一个常驻的PTR服务器，可以在那边测试新的坦克和新的机制，就像WOW的PTR一样

2.splittng the conqueror into fv215b and the chieftain, same way the t-54 splits up.
把征服者分成FV215b和酋长两辆车，就像T-54被分成两辆车一样

-FV215b is a tank we had to invent back in the days, Chieftain is real.
FV215b是我们在以前必须要自己“发明”才行的，而酋长是实际存在的

How bad did the Chieftain armor have to be for them to hold off putting it in?
Just put it in. It’s not like this will be the first time they put an underpowered tank in game… and they can always buff it.
酋长的装甲到底有多烂才能拿来作为不实装的理由啊？就实装嘛~反正你们又不是第一次实装这种太弱的坦克了……反正总归有办法Buff一下不是吗

-It’s bad enough, T-54 or is-3 can pen turret with regular ammo, not just cupola. You simply cannot tank enemy shells in tier X with this tank. We have enough of glass cannon tanks in the game, why add another?
装甲很烂。T-54或者IS-3可以用银币弹直接击穿炮塔，而且击穿的还不是观察塔。在10级房里面根本没法拿这辆车出去吃炮弹。我们的游戏中已经有足够多的脆皮大屌怪了，还要再加？

Wait, did they just say camo paint benefits smaller tanks more??? I thought it was flat based on class – HT 2%, MT and LT 3%, and TDs the highest. How does this actually work? What exactly does the comment mean?
哎你等一下啊，你是不是之前说小车的涂装收益更大？？？我以为这个是根据车型来的的啊——重坦2%，中坦和轻坦3%，TD收益最高。这到底怎么回事？你那句话什么意思啊？

-Percentage is relative value, that’s how. So yes, let’s say you have 100 camo with LT and 3% of said camo is 3. And you have 10 camo in Maus, same 3% is 0.3.
那个百分比只是一个相对值而已。比如说你的轻坦有100的隐蔽，所以涂装的3%的加成是3点隐蔽值。而你的鼠式只有10点隐蔽，所以10点的3%只有0.3罢了。

WG is planning to take away my female crew with crew redesign?!!111
WG要在乘员重做的时候拿走我的女性乘员吗！！！111

-No, it’s a mission reward, I like female crews 🙂
不会的，因为女性乘员是任务奖励。我也很喜欢女乘员的啊:)

RG: For those who asked about the Sentinel, it will be premium
RG：有人在问哨兵巡洋坦克的事情，它会作为金币车来卖。