Daigensui的日本重坦QA

Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/07/japanese-heavies-q-with-daigensui.html
来源↗
删节了原文中一部分与重坦无关的内容

Hello Warriors,
大家嚎,

as promised here is the “Japanese Heavies Q&A” with Daigensui, these questions were picked from the comment section of a previous normal Q&A:
之前说过的会和Daigensui一起搞的“日本重坦QA”,问题都是从之前的QA的评论区里选的:

Is there a possibility to have a t8 prem for the IJA HT?
– Yes, although it will take a while.
有没有可能会出8级金币日本重坦?
-可能性是有的,但是可能需要等一段时间


For the Type 5 HT, is the gun originally from 14cm naval gun.
– Yes.
五式重坦的炮原来是不是14cm海军炮啊?
-是的

How much of the line is created by WG/you (due to lack of historical data) ?
– There was constant communication and cooperation. So say which part of the line was made by which is impossible to say, never mind needless.
这条线有多少是WG/你自己弄出来的(因为历史数据不足)?
-在我和WG之间不停的有各种联络和合作。所以不好说到底是谁弄出了这条线的某个部分,也从来没操心过这事

Regarding high-tiered Japanese HT armaments.
Considering the cooperation between Rikugun and Kaigun was unlikely since the Rikugun and Kaigun were not on good terms at the start of the war , is it even possible for Rikugun to obtain 12,7 cm and 14 cm Naval Artillery to be mounted on their tanks and have ammunition supplied to them?
– If we suppose that IJA supplied the hull for use in coastal defense, then it is possible. After all, IJN did do their own modifications with Chi-Ha with 12 cm guns.
关于高阶重坦的炮。
鉴于陆军和海军之间的关系从开战的时候就不怎么样,海军和陆军之间也很难会有什么合作。那陆军到底有没有可能能够拿到海军的12.7cm和14cm炮然后装在坦克上,还能保证有足够的弹药补给呢?
– 如果我们假设是IJA提供用于岸防的车身的话,你说的这些是有可能的。因为IJN的确是有自己弄的装120mm炮的九七中战。

译注:九七中战的IJA版是57mm炮

Is the O-I 120 model correct? According to SoukouDragon’s article from 2013 there is no 4th turret (third miniturret) behind the main turret: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/
– About as “correct” as possible. Plus, you have to realize that there are quite a few artist’s interpretations that are not based on actual blueprints or interviews with the engineers who worked on the projects.
O-I 120的模型是对的吗?根据SoukouDragon在2013年的文章,在主炮塔后面应该是没有第四个炮塔(第三个小炮塔的):链接
-这个是相当“正确”的。而且你也要知道有很多画家是凭着自己的感觉再画,而不是参照蓝图或者是参照那些实际参与过这个计划的工程师的采访而画的。

These tanks are obviously very large, do you think that they might be restricted gameplay and teamwork-wise because of their size? For example, on a map like Himmelsdorf, the new tanks could take up so much space, that they could be problematic for allies.
– About as problematic as T95.
这些坦克都很大,所以你认为它们由于尺寸的原因会不会在游戏性和团队合作方面会收到一线限制?比如说栗如锡城这样的图,因为它们的尺寸过于巨大,可能会对友军造成一些麻烦
– 跟T95一个德行

Will the new heavy tanks have any interchangeable modules with the current lines?
– Maybe, we’ll see how the TD line works out.
新的重坦和现有的线会不会有通用的模块?
– 也许会有吧,要看TD线怎么整了

From what tank it will start the new heavy branch?(Chi-Ha, or Chi-He)?
 – Starts from Tier 1.
新重坦线是什么车开始的?(九七中战还是一式中战?)
– 从1级开始啦

Modules (engines, radios, gun) from medium tree will be available for some tanks in the new heavy tree?
 – Radio should be interchangable.
中坦线的模块(发动机,电台,炮)等等能不能够用在重坦线的部分车上?
– 电台应该是可以拿来用

How many crew members will the tier X have?
– Six, obviously.
10级车有几个乘员?
– 明摆着,六个

What suspension types were investigated for the Japanese Heavy projects? Was it a beefed up version of the standard Hara bell cranks or something else entirely?
日本重坦用的是什么样的悬挂?是加强版的Hara悬挂还是完全不同的新东西?
L7i6SZB

What role were the heavy tanks intended to fill in the Japanese order of battle/who wanted them? (ie type 95 ha go was a cavalry tank, Type 97 chi ha was infantry support, Type 91/95 heavy was for………)
– Armored bunker to dominate any and all land-based opposition.
日本重坦到底是要在日本的战斗中扮演什么样的角色/谁提出要造重坦的?(比如九五轻战是步兵支援车,九一/九五重战是拿来……)
– 装甲碉堡,用于搞定所有陆地上的敌人

How were the vehicles intended to be transported outside of combat?
– By its own power, likely. I doubt they thought that far ahead.
这些车在不打仗的时候到底要怎么运输?
– 估计是自己开过去。我觉得他们根本就没想到这一点。

Were there any derivatives of the designs for other purposes ie SPG/Tank Destroyer ?
– No.
这些设计有没有衍生版,比如火炮或者TD版?
– 没有。

On the higher tier Japanese heavies most of the angling is actually terrible, lets be honest it’s quite flat. If you take a look at the STA-1, STB-1, Type 61 and so on they have well angled upper plates, so if they design tanks as insane as the heavies why did they forget about angling ? What happened ?
– First, you’re comparing postwar JGSDF to IJA. Second, it’s likely more an issue of whether angling would have been possible. With IJN sucking up all the welding experts, I would say that IJA didn’t have the necessary expert manpower to ensure that angling of such heavy plates would not fall apart under its own weight or from impact.
高阶日本重坦的(装甲的倾斜)角度都很差,说实话吧,这就是平的。如果你看看STA-1,STB-1,61式和其他车的话,它们的首上倾斜角度是很大的,如果他们能够设计出类似于重坦这种玩意的话,他们怎么就没想起来要倾斜下装甲板?到底怎么了?
– 首先你这是在拿日本的自卫队跟IJA来比。其次要看倾斜装甲到底能不能做出来。因为IJN拿走了所有的焊接专家,我觉得IJA没有能够做到让这么重的装甲板由于自身重量原因或者是外力冲击之下不掉下来的技术专家

Daigensui的日本重坦QA》上有4条评论

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注