Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/06/yuri-pasholok-q_8.html
来源↗

Hello warriors,
大家嚎，

a couple more answers from Yuri Pasholok regarding some historical elements of World of Tanks
Yuri Pasholok又回答了更多关于WOT的历史元素的问题：

– Just like the Chinese TD’s, the SPG’s do resemble the Soviet solutions. The chassis used are of Soviet origins, as are the solutions – for example in 1944 the Soviets decided to put the 122mm M-30 howitzer on SU-76M chassis and the Chinese did the same thing with the 152mm D-1 howitzer. D-1 shared the mount with M-30 so it’s not impossible.
和中国的TD一样，中国的火炮可以算是苏联炮的复刻版。底盘用的都是苏联货，做出来的东西也差不多—举个栗子，苏联在1944年决定把122mm M-30迫击炮装在SU-76M的底盘上，中国也选择装上一个152mm D-1炮。D-1的炮架和M-30是一样的，所以这并不是什么不可能完成的事情

– It’s definitely not a rule that riveted Japanese tanks were all early and the late ones were welded – for example the quite late Type 92 Kei-Sensha was riveted as well;
并不是说所有的铆接的日本车都是早期产物，而焊接的就一定是后期的产物—举个栗子，九二式重装甲車就是铆接的。
译注：此处需要更多考证。九二式的确是铆接没错，但原文中提到的却是九二式轻战车
而非重装甲车，而IJA却是没有九二式轻战车，只有九七式轻战车……

– The heavies Japanese tank proposal weighed roughly 150 tons (although that’s nothing compared to the French and their SEAM 1940 220 ton proposal);
日本曾经计划要搞的重坦的重量大约是在150吨左右（尽管和法国人当时提出的SEAM 1940的220吨坦克方案一比就显得没什么了……）

– The Italians had some heavy tank of the truly heavy category, for example the T-39 – it will likely never appear in World of Tanks however due to the fact it has multiple turrets;
意大利人是搞过真正属于重坦范畴的重坦的，举个栗子，T-39—但是这车由于是多炮塔的缘故估计永远不会出现在WOT里

– Not all Swedish late vehicles will come at once (for example the artillery will likely come only after the heavy branch);
并不是所有的瑞典车都会一口气被加入游戏（比如瑞典火炮就要在重坦线之后再做了）

– The French had a M4 variant with 280mm thick frontal armor (this will likely never appear in the game).
法国人曾经设计过一版M4，正面装甲厚度280mm（这个也是估计永远不会出现在游戏中）

– The Matilda I was armed with a .50cal Vickers HMG but the question is, what would two Matildas do if they met one another in the game with their armor;
玛蒂尔达I曾经装备过.50口径的维克斯重机枪，但是问题在于——两个装着机枪，而防护又和现在一样的玛蒂尔达在游戏中碰面该怎么办

– Christie tank branch was developed like 3 years ago but generally it’s very bad, Christie tanks don’t get above tier 2 since they have about the same armament as their competition (the T1 Light Tank): 37mm infantry gun model 1916. And a one man turret. There are no real upgrades available for them.
克里斯蒂坦克线在三年前就开发好了，但是总的来说这条线很糟糕。克里斯蒂坦克基本上搞不出二级以上的车，因为它们的主炮和竞争对手们的（T1轻）差不多：37mm步兵炮，1916年版。还有一个单人炮塔。这车也真的没有什么改进空间

– The E-50 Ausf.M is not a total fake. Based on the requirements for the E-50 the vehicle was supposed to have rear transmission. So the E-50 Ausf.M is something like “an artist’s impression of how the tank would look if it was developed”. The E-50/E-75 series suspension is mostly a fiction based on the artist impression of drawing-makers (not the WG ones but the historical ones) – serious people such as Hilary Louis Doyle did not draw anything apart from a side view of the hull, the various drawings going around the internet are all just fantasies of some artists. There is however a historical drawing of the Tiger/Panther (late) suspension proposal (this is what basically is the E 50/75, a Tiger II simplified for production with different turrets) – with leaf springs (basically a copy of Praga suspension)!
E-50M并不是彻头彻尾的虚构计划。基于E-50的提案，这车应该是有后置传动的。所以E-50M就像是“一个画家对于如果这车开发出来了的话看上去会怎么样的”这么个产物。E-50/E-75系列的悬挂很大可能是基于那些画图的人的印象而进行艺术加工过的产物（不是WG的画师，是历史上的那些）—类似于Hilary Louis Doyle（Panzer Tracts的作者之一—译注）的人除了画了一张车身侧面图以外就没画过别的了，网上的那些图估计都只是某些画师的创作而已。然而历史上的确有过一张虎式/豹式（后期型）的悬挂（这个基本就是E-50/75了，虎王简化版，带了个不同的炮塔）——用的也是片簧（Praga悬挂的翻版而已）