【Developer Q&A 】2014/11/16

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/16/16-11-2014/
来源↗

First, a small correction – remember the Dicker Max individual mission post? It turns out that you get the Dicker Max after completing the previous missions, not straight away. I apologize for the mistake.
首先做下更正—昨天有一个关于独立任务可以拿到大麦克斯的帖子,还记得吧?现在发现是你必须要做完所有的任务才能拿到,而不是直接拿到。我对我的失误表示抱歉。
译注:大意就是有一名AFK很久的玩家收到了邮件,让他回来玩WOT,有若干任务,最终奖励是大麦一辆 

– Q: “Everybody knows that in 9.5, tanks will get a viewrange nerf…” A (Storm): “Everybody knows, only I don’t know anything.”
问:“大家都知道9.5中的坦克的视野要被砍了……”答(Storm):“大家都知道,就我什么都不知道”

– apparently, IS-7 and IS-8 rear side armor are historical (they have correct shape)
IS-7和IS-8的车身侧面装甲的后半部分是史实的(形状没问题)

– SerB confirms that it’s possible for a shell to pass through a hole, that is smaller than its caliber in WoT, but: “Probability of that is somewhere around 1 to 100k – we are ignoring that and will continue to ignore that.”
SerB肯定说WOT中的炮弹是可以穿过一个比自己口径要小的洞的,但是:“这种情况发生的概率大约是1/100000—我们一直以来都忽略掉这种特殊情况,以后也一直会”

– Q: “Why do you want to nerf the viewrange of 300 vehicles for the sake of 5 tier 8 LT’s? It’s connected to the “war on TD’s” and bad arty nerf. I propose: reduce team size to 12, hardcap arty to 2 per side and take half of their shells away!” A: “Game design by players sucks. Instead of fixing the respective parameter you propose to change the general game rules, after you bash us for making too big changes. Logic, logic everywhere.” (SS: the translation of the answer here is not literal, for example the first sentence is actually a quote, that makes little sense in English. Was trying to keep the point SerB made instead.)
问:“你们为什么要为了这5辆8级轻坦就砍掉300多辆车的视野?这个和“TD世界”还有火炮大砍一定有关系。我的想法是:把队伍大小缩减到12人,火炮限制到2门,然后载弹量减半!”答:“玩家设计的游戏一般都是屎。你骂完我们做的一大堆改动以后,所做的并不是修复特定的参数,而是直接改变游戏的规则。屌,你看屌在天上飞了。”(SS:这里的回答并不是字面意义上的直译,栗如第一句话其实是一句名台词,而翻译成英文就说不通了。我这里把SerB要表达的意思都表达了)

– T-44-85 and T-34-85M in the game? “When it’s done it’s done.”
T-44-85和T-34-85M啥时候出现在游戏内?“When it’s done it’s done.”

– Coated optics is active all the time, not only when the vehicle is moving
高光是一直生效的,并不只是在车辆移动的时候才有效

– Q: “Enough with the “improving” of team battles!” A: “Well, that’s up to you whether you have enough or not. Noone is keeping you here.”
问:“你们对于7/54的“改进”究竟够了没?”答:“呃,这事是你来觉得到底够不够的。没人逼着你玩7/54。” 

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注