Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/
来源↗
Check the new article by Listy about US Marines serving in China
看看Listy的关于在中国服役的美国海军陆战队的新文章
– Storm on quoting Discovery Channel (Great Tank Battles show) as a historical source: “Discovery is even more laughable than Wikipedia. My source are our historical consultants.” (SS: the question was, whether there were Tigers in Ardennes – there were a few, they didn’t fight though)
Storm关于引用探索频道（伟大的坦克战争节目——暂译）作为历史资料来源：“探索频道比维基百科更能让我大笑一场。我的来源是我们的历史资料顾问”（SS：那个问题是，虎式究竟有没有出现于阿登之战中—有过一些，但是没有实际投入战斗就是了）
– for now, developers aren’t considering removing the rule where both sides have to have the same amount of arty (and scouts) (SS: this rule is not absolute, I think there is +/-1 tolerance)
现在开发团队没有考虑要把两队火炮（以及侦察车）数量相等这一规则移去（SS：这个MM规则并不是绝对的，我记得好像有±1的偏差值）
– Storm states that when it comes to historicity of guns in World of Tanks – made up tanks (WT E-100) can have any gun that fits, historical tanks can only have guns they had in real life
Storm表示说他们在搞WOT里的史实坦克主炮的时候—那些YY车（WT E-100）可以装上任何符合该车的炮，史实坦克只能用他们在现实生活中有过的炮
– Storm regarding the assault mode: “What is there to comment? It’s a normal mode. I play it from the beginning without switching it off.”
Storm关于攻防战的看法：“有什么可说的？这就是个普通的模式。我从一开始就一直在玩，从来没关过。”
– Storm, explaining why assault and encounter modes don’t have their own specialized maps and responding to a player who claims they are bland:
Storm解释为何攻防战以及夺旗战没有自己特制的地图， 以及回复一名玩家问为何它们很无聊时：
“Because we don’t consider it rational to make maps for those mods only. You personally decide the level of blandness of a mode? Are there any normal criteria that determine “blandness”? Assault and Encounter mode are finished and polished. Historical battles are in the state of finding the correct solution.”
“因为我们不认为给这些地图搞出自己的地图是合理的。你自己就能说这个模式很无聊？难道说有什么‘无聊等级’的评分表格吗？攻防战和夺旗战都已经是完成且调整过的模式了。历史战现在还处于寻找正确的解决方案的阶段。”
– Storm reacting on the “28 bots in one game” video: “You’d have to find out what is shown in there in general and how it happened. Personally, I don’t have time to do this on Sunday. Sorry.”
Storm关于“一场战斗28个挂机”的视频：“你必须要自己去找出在视频中发生了什么，而它又是怎么发生的。我个人在礼拜天没这个时间跟你搞。抱歉。”
– according to Storm, the TD share in battles has long since stopped growing and now is within normal frame. WG checks every month.
Storm表示TD在战斗中所占的比例在很久之前就停止增长了，现在处于一个常规的范围之内。WG每个月都在看数据。
– too many TD’s in battles? “Statistics do not confirm that” and “We do not observe the dominance of TD’s”
战斗中TD太多？“数据并不这么说”以及“我们没有观察到TD统治游戏的情况”
– long map loading? “We are investigate this issue”
地图载入时间太长？“我们在调查这个问题”
– Storm states that the IS-7 buff planned was a hoax started by Jove (Russian streamer), there will be no buff (SS: to my eternal shame, I jumped on this too – basically, he – or someone else – photoshopped a fake screenshot of “Storm’s post”)
Storm表示说要BuffIS-7的计划是由Jove（毛服直播主）挑起的流言，并不会有对IS-7的Buff（SS：把我钉在耻辱柱上好了，我个人也信了这个东西—总的来说，他—或者是某个人—PS了一张“Storm的回复”的截图）
This is how the fake looked (quite convincing)
这就是P过的图（挺真的）
– Storm doesn’t know whether the A45/FV201 will be a tier 7 or 8 and when will it come
Storm并不知道A45/FV201在被搞出来的时候到底是7级还是8级车
– situations where you get the same map several times in a row are apparently okay
连续好几轮进同一张地图是没问题的