Source: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/27/27-8-2013/
You’ll like this, SerB’s on the roll again.
你会喜欢这个的，SerB又来了次 Q&A 连发
– SerB on Gaijin War Thunder tanks, when asked what he thinks about them:
– 当 SerB 被问及他如何看待 Gaijin 的 WT 陆战坦克 时：
“We do watch them. Company Gaijin, by the way, puts a lot of effort into making its project NOT resembling WoT (true, not always – for example module unlocking they made basically the same as we have it in the end, only instead of normal stock modules they give out “worn out” modules). And so their experience is very valuable for us, mostly in the “how not to do it” part. But if they – let’s say – manage to make a playable tank game with better historicity (Tiger with heavier turret(c)), we will gladly learn from their experience”
“我们有关注他们。顺便说一些，Gaijin 公司付出了很多努力让他们的游戏不会和 WoT 过于相似（真的，但是也有例外 – 比方说坦克配件的研发，他们做的和我们基本一样，唯一的区别是他们以“老旧”型号代替通常的白板车）。因此他们的经验对我们来说非常有价值，尤其是在“如何保持克制”这方面。如果他们能实现我们所说的那样 – 在保证游戏性的同时尽可能的还原历史(做出虎式更重的c型炮塔【译注：WoT 中的 虎式 完全体炮塔为中期型，历史上后期型炮塔将顶部装甲由 25mm 增加至 40mm ，改善了炮塔内部环境】)，我们十分乐意学习他们的经验”
– SU-152 Taran is not planned
– SU-152 Taran 不打算加入到游戏(译注：一种1965年生产的战后版本SU-152。资料链接：http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/167464-su-152-taran/)
– Q (on SerB): “How did the EU community react on the Stalin inscriptions returning?” A: “Majority doesn’t care, the only ones with butthurting are the Polish (it’s their national sport) and – oddly enough – Romanians”
– Q（问SerB）：“欧服论坛对标语 斯大林 的回归有什么反应？”
A：“大部分并不在意，只有波兰人被爆菊了（这是他们的全民运动），奇怪的是罗马尼亚也加入到了其中”（翻译表示无法直视，简直无情）
– SerB on Comet being UP: “I don’t understand how bad a player you have to be not to pwn in Comet”
– SerB 回应 彗星 需要加强：“我不能理解，你是要有多彩笔用 彗星 都虐不了人”
– SerB on dynamic tank characteristics in hangar: “In my opinion, this is what should have been made instead of screwing up shell sliders. But our UI makers have their own vision”
– SerB回应车库中显示坦克动态数据：“在我看来，这个早应该做好了而不是去搞砸那个炮弹滑动条。但是我们的UI设计师有自己的看法”
– Landkreuzer Ratte will not appear in WoT even as map decoration
– P-1000 巨鼠坦克不会出现在游戏里，甚至做地图上的装饰物都不行
– what will follow in branch after Chaffee? “No comment”
– 霞飞 线后边都是什么车？“无可奉告”
– the “you get as much XP for losing as you get for winning if you get a medal” feature in 8.8 test will make it to the public server
– 8.8 测试服中“当你获得史诗勋章却输掉了，这时你得到经验会和胜利时一样多”，这条规则将做到正式服里
– SerB states that WoT made the Kubinka museum increase its visitor count 4 times
– SerB表示 WoT 使得 库宾卡博物馆 的参观人次增加了4倍
– SerB on various player-made “votes” and “surveys” about game matters: “We will be guided by player surveys only if democracy is brought to Wargaming by American bombers, or if the players buy 51 percent of WG shares”
– SerB 对玩家发起的各种有关游戏的“投票”和“调查”：“只有妹国轰炸机将皿煮带到 Wargaming ，或者玩家们买下 WG 51%的股权，我们才会以玩家调查为指导做游戏”
– Player Kwot34 asks SerB: “What will be your thoughts if I show you my Comet results?” A:”(my thoughts will be) ‘Am I such a bad player as Kwot34?’”
– 玩家 Kwot34 问 SerB ：“如果我把我的 彗星 战绩给你看你会怎么想？”
A：“（我会这么想） ‘我会是像 Kwot34 一样的彩笔?’”——此条对应前边 彗星 需要加强
– 8.8 lower frontal armor of Tiger II (100mm) is historical (SS: yes it is, according to Doyle), the 120mm LFP is a mistake coming from one Russian book by an author named Barjatinskij, it’s widespread on RU forums
– 8.8 虎王 首下装甲（100mm）是符合历史的（SS：根据 Doyle 的说法，是这样的），首下 120mm 这个错误出自 Barjatinskij 的一本俄文书，它在俄服论坛上广为流传
– the 8.8 Superpershing frontal armor is now completely historical
– 8.8 超级潘兴的正面装甲现在完全符合史实
– Jagdtiger 88 won’t be changed as a part of the 8.8 German changes, because it is a premium vehicle. For now at least.
– 猎虎88 不会随着 8.8 德系变动而修改，因为它是一辆金币车。至少现在不会
– Jagdtiger lower frontal plate will also be reduced from 120 to 100mm
– 猎虎 的首下装甲也从 120mm 减少到了 100mm
– Q: “Okay, you are not changing JT88 so more people buy it?” A: “Conspiracy everywhere, how are we supposed to live with that?!”
– Q：“你们不改动 猎虎88 是为了让更多人买它？”
A：“怎么哪都有阴谋论，难不成我们靠着它过活?!”
– Q: “JT88 was not touched ‘for now’, is it possible it will be nerfed and gold will be returned like in SP case?” A: “Everything’s possible”
– Q：“ 猎虎88 ‘暂时’不变，那以后有没有可能会被砍然后像超潘一样用金币回购？”
A：“一切皆有可能”
– crew XP gain mechanism was not touched in 8.8
– 8.8 不会改动乘员经验的获得机制
– WG considers 1 degree error in armor slope compared to the historical original acceptable
– WG 认为与历史原型车的装甲倾角差出1度是在误差允许范围内的
– E-75 might be buffed a bit for test 2 of 8.8 in order to compensate for the loss of the 1200hp engine
– E-75 在 8.8 2测可能会有一些加强，以补偿它失去的 1200马力 发动机
– SerB is very invested in WoT Xbox 360
– SerB 对 Xbox 360 上的 WoT 十分投入
– SerB answers to a player, who suggested the Object 140 to be on tier 9 and refers to a player survey that the players want it: “It’s a stupid proposal. You proposed the branch that was intended originally. But the problem is – the proposal to put Object 140 on tier 9 was already declined. We talked about this earlier. But you and others like you don’t read, you only write… and putting Object 140 on tier 9 will not succeed even if 100500 players vote for this stupidity.”
– 一个玩家建议 140工程 变成 9 级车，并且提供了玩家调查说明很多人都这么想，SerB 回应他：“真是个愚蠢的建议。你的建议是之前预想的线路。但问题是 – 把 140工程 变成9级车的建议早就被否决了。我们之前的 Q&A 说过的。但是你和其他人都从来不看，只顾急于表达…就算有100500个玩家投票支持你的愚蠢行为，140工程 也不会从 10 级变 ⑨ 级”（这里的 ⑨ 恰到好处）（另：100500梗参照：http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%2B100500）
– Object 140 is better armored than T-54
– 140工程 的装甲比 T-54 强
– about demolitions of bridges in WOT (when Havok is implemented): “In World of Tanks we’ll have to solve the issue with tanks standing under them getting buried by the rubble”
– 关于 WoT 中的毁坏桥梁（当 Havok 引擎的物理破坏引入后）：“在坦克世界里，我们将不得不解决坦克站在桥下，被废墟掩埋而后带来的问题”