Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/08/29082015-q-long.html
来源↗

Behold! Here is the Q&A:
                                                               看！一大波QA正在靠近：

– Putting 4K textures in WoT is too resource-expensive for now;
给WOT做4K的材质太吃资源了

– It’s not yet decided whether such textures will come in the future;
现在还没定下来以后会不会搞4K贴图

– Visual weather will not be implemented: “Why introduce it, so that people with weak PC’s disable it because it lowers their FPS and good players disable it because it interferes with their gameplay?”
不会加入视觉性的天气效果：“为啥要做啊，那些老爷机会因为天气效果导致掉帧所以把它关掉，然后高玩又会因为它影响游戏性也给它关掉？”

– Really many people have special effects in sniper mode disabled;
真的有很多人关掉了开镜模式下的特效

– Currently WG is developing a variant of complete crew and perk overhaul so that the current issues would disappear (useless perks, missing crew members when switching to another tank – or “radiomen in then barracks” issue, zero alternatives when selecting which perks you want first).The main idea is “one crew as an entity without each crewmember having different perks” – not like in WoWs but something around that idea.
现在WG在搞整体的乘员技能重制，以解决现有系统中的问题（没有的技能，在换到其他车上少人—或者是“兵营中全是通讯兵”这种问题，在选择一技能的时候根本没有回旋余地）。主要的想法是“一辆车的全部乘员会被作为一个整体对待，而不是每个成员都有着自己独立的技能”—并不是像WOWS那种系统，但是概念上都是差不多的

– It was never MM’s goal to make mirror teams;
MM的目的从来就不是做出镜像的队伍

– Some players are proposing a rollback to classic versions of Malinovka, Murovanka etc. – Storm: “So you want to return the great camping game “who camps more in the bushes”?”
部分玩家在提议说把马利诺夫卡，穆勒万卡等等地图回滚到最早的那个版本—Storm：“所以你是想回到之前那种“比谁蹲草蹲的住”的那个时代吗？”

– It’s possible to introduce vehicle component physics (for example shaking antennae, fuel tanks falling off) even without Havok;
在没有Havok的情况下也是可以做车辆组件的物理效果的（比如会动的天线，油箱被打掉等等）

– The tank control feature where if you stop pressing “W” the tank immediately stops was made intentionally to make the tank control easier;
在不按‘W’的情况下坦克会立刻停车这个机制是故意做出来的，为的是让坦克的控制更加简单

– There are developers who completed the individual missions (people with 70 percent winrate and higher), according the Storm they did not abuse the developer function of being able to select which map they want to play in random battles;
开发团队中有人完成了个人任务（胜率在70%及以上的那些），Storm表示他们并没有滥用开发团队的特有的可以在随机战中选择想要玩的地图的功能

– High end PC’s have “more than sufficient” performance in WoT, “nobody needs 100+ FPS”;
高端的PC对WOT来说“性能过剩”，“没人需要100+的帧数”

– Q: “I need 100+ FPS!” A: “Yeah? And what famous cybersports team are you playing in? What prizes have you won?” (he later adds that in WoT, there’s no noticable difference between 60 FPS and 120 FPS, FPS stability and conversion of excessive FPS to image quality are more important);
问：“我需要100+帧啊！”答：“恩？那你又在哪个电竞队伍里面打比赛啊？你赢过哪些奖啊？”（他后面补充说在WOT中，60帧跟120帧是看不出什么差别的，帧数的稳定性以及把过剩的帧数转变成更高的画面质量是更重要的）

– There is no FPS guarantee in WoT, all that depends on PC configuration;
WOT并不能保证可以在多少帧上运行，一切都要看PC的配置

– The Chieftain situation is complicated according to Storm. The vehicle that is standing in Bovington is called Mk.2 by the Bovvy workers. Wargaming made a 3D scan of that vehicle. When the scan was already done, they found out that it’s not a Mk.2 but a Mk.6. The armor model was taken from the Bovvy Chieftain as well (RG: two things – first, the 120mm frontal armor Chieftain is a myth, spread by wrong sources, second – not all armor parts could be measured, a part of the Chieftain armor model is pure guesswork);
Storm说酋长现在的问题很复杂。伯明顿那边的工作人员说他们的车是Mk.2。WG就对它进行了3D扫描。等扫描弄好以后，他们才发现这不是Mk.2，而是个Mk.6。装甲数据也是直接从伯明顿那边采集来的（RG：说两件事—首先，酋长正面有120mm这件事都是谣传，不知道是从谁那里传出来的。其次—并不是所有的装甲都可以被测量，酋长部分装甲的厚度都是纯猜测的）

– Storm confirms: Chieftain will keep its 750hp engine and 55 ton weight. It will have really thin hull but a really, really good gun.
Storm的肯定消息：酋长会保留它750马力的发动机以及55吨的重量。它的车身会很薄，但是会有一杆非常非常好的主炮。

– There were no other tier 10 British HT candidates than the Chieftain (a player was promoting Listy’s “Super Conqueror” with improved armor, this was not considered: “Unfortunately, there’s not a single word about armor, only the words of this guy (Listy) without any proof unless I am misreading it”) – Storm later learns that it was Listy who measured the Chieftain and Conqueror for Wargaming and backs off a bit, it’s possible the “Super Conqueror” will go somewhere else instead;
除了酋长之外没有其他的英国10级重坦候选车可用（有玩家提议去用Listy的“超级征服者”，把装甲提升一下就行了。但是开发团队并没有考虑要这么做：“这里面没有一个字提到装甲，除非是我看错，不然整篇文章中都只有这货（Listy）自己的猜测而已”）—Storm后面知道是Listy帮着WG测量了酋长跟征服者的，所以他的态度转变了一些。“超级征服者”有可能会出现在其它的什么地方。

– The only reason FV215b is getting replaced is the fact it’s made up, otherwise statistically it’s okay;
FV215b被替换掉的唯一原因是它是虚构的，数据上来说其实没问题

– WG will not implement existing mods officially: “the problem is in bugs and performance loss”: “some modpacks on certain PC’s eat up 50-60 percent of performance and certain popular modpacks increase number of crashes by an order of magnitude”. The fact your PC doesn’t suffer from FPS drops caused by mods doesn’t mean other PC’s don’t have that. Modmakers are also not bound by any rules, they can make whatever mods they want without considering bugs of performance issues while Wargaming cannot implement some functions due to serious FPS losses on some PCs. An example would be the XVM minimap that makes some PCs lose a lot of FPS.
WG不会官方的把现有的Mod实装进游戏中：“问题在于Bug和优化不足”：“部分电脑在安装了特定的整合包之后会导致50~60%性能上的下降，而且某些人气很高的整合包会导致崩溃数量呈几何式上涨”。而你的电脑在安装了之后不掉帧并不意味着别人的就不掉了。而且Mod作者也不受任何限制，他们可以在不考虑Bug和性能的情况下随便做Mod，而WG由于要考虑到性能的关系所以不能这么做。XVM的小地图就是个很好的栗子，它在很多电脑上都会导致大量掉帧

– Many functions previously implemented by mods were already implemented into the game officially, this process will continue;
之前由Mod提供的很多功能都由官方直接做进游戏了，他们会继续这么搞下去的

– Flash game UI will not be reworked to another platform;
用Flash制作的游戏UI不会被重制到其它的平台上

– Multi-turret mechanism: “For a few vehicles only, why do you need that?”
多炮塔机制：“就那么几个车能用，你为什么想要这个嘛？”

– Hydraulic suspension: “For two vehicles, why do you need that?”
液压悬挂：“就俩车能用，你为什么想要这个嘛？”

– AA vehicles: “There are no planes in WoT, why do you need that?”
防空车：“WOT里面又没有飞机，你为什么想要这个嘛”

– Wheeled vehicles: “Those would go to tier 5-6 max, why do you need that?” (RG: This is not true. Wargaming made about a year ago a full branch proposal for French wheeled vehicles and armored cars);
轮式车辆：“最多5~6级就封顶了，你为什么想要这个嘛？”（RG：这个不对，WG在一年之前曾经准备要弄一条完整的法国轮式车辆/装甲车线）

– Storm later adds that the vehicle types listed above would be played only a few players;
Storm后来说上面列出的几个车型只有一小部分玩家会去玩

– Wargaming is developing “many features that will introduce diverse gameplay”;
WG在开发“许多能够带来多样化的游戏体验的机制”

– It is not technically possible to make the client play the replays of old versions;
技术手段上来说是没办法让客户端播放旧版本的录像的

– French tier 5-7 guns do have different damage for AP and APCR rounds, this is a bug and will be fixed;
法国的5~7级炮的AP和APCR伤害不一样，这个Bug会被修复

– More rewards for top 3 players of losing team are not planned since the losing team could consist entirely of players who played really bad and WG does not want to reward crap gameplay;
没有计划要给败者队伍的前三名做更多的奖励，因为有可能会出现败者队伍中全都是垃圾玩家的情况，而WG又不想鼓励那些玩得特别差的玩家

– Storm is not the WoT project leader (RG: he’s the chief developer);
Storm并不是WOT的项目领导（RG：他是首席开发者）

– The map distribution changes were made for the newbies to learn to play easier. It was not possible to let experienced players to play on more maps on lower tiers because this produced long waiting queues.
之前提到的地图池变换是为了让新人更加轻松的去学习怎么玩游戏。而且也没有办法做到让那些有经验的玩家在低级车上玩更多的地图，因为这么做会导致战斗等待队列过长

– There will be an improved tutorial in the future;
以后会有改进过的教程的

– Wot-news vehicle statistics are NOT a proof of anything when it comes to WG;
wot-news的车辆数据不能对WG起到任何证明作用

– Practically nobody is playing tier 2 premium tanks;
基本没人在玩2级的金币车

– Current online numbers in WoT are higher than those last year during the same time;
WOT现在的在线数量比去年这个时候的要高

– Chat 2.0 core was already programmed – interface, not so much (only partially);
聊天系统2.0的核心的代码已经写完了—至于界面还没有（只弄了一部分）

– There are no immediate plans for new winter and desert maps;
近期没有要出新的冬季和沙漠地图的计划

– The current 9.10 map distribution is final but there will be a patch with some changes, the 9.10 patch is already compiled;
现在的9.10的地图池已经定下来了，但是会有一个改动性的补丁，9.10整个补丁已经编译完成了

– Developers are still considering “solving” teamkilling by removing the possibility to do damage to allies.
开发团队依然还在考虑要不要通过移除可以攻击队友的功能来“解决”TK问题