Source:http://ritastatusreport.blogspot.nl/2015/07/20072015-q.html
来源↗

Well, it turns out that the FTA Q&A (published earlier) is partially fake:
昨天说过的内容可能不正确的QA的确有一些是错的：

– Storm confirms: the Dx11 support soon (within two patches) claim (from FTA) was a fake (a lie);
Storm的确切消息：近期内就能搞定Dx11的支持这件事（两个补丁之内）的说法是错的

– When you switch between tanks, there’s apparently a slight “twitching” in some cases (TXAA enabled), this is caused by the TXAA;
在切车的时候会发生“抽搐”的情况（打开了TXAA才会有这问题），这个的确是由TXAA造成的

– Storm admits that after 9.9 some vehicles (Soviet and Chinese) have different visual models from collision models (the bottom part), this is intentional.
Storm承认在9.9之后部分车辆（苏联的和中国的）的视觉模型和碰撞模型不一样（车底盘的部分），这个是有意为之的

Yuri Pasholok on the “FTA Q&A”
Yuri Pasholok对于“FTA的Q&A”的说法：

– Regarding ASU-85: “Yea yea, definitely. We really are holding ASU-85 in reserve but I don’t remember it being discussed as a premium. Where is this from?”
关于ASU-85：“是啦是啦，没错。我们的确是一直捂着没放出来，但是我不记得我们说过这车会作为金币车出现啊。这消息都是哪来的啦？”

– Regarding the “uncertain” switch of WT E-100: “The vehicle is already clearly specified. Of course, there are people at WG who don’t like it but no alternatives were discussed.”
关于“WT E-100”的换车的不确定性：“用于替换的车已经明确说明过了。当然了，WG内部也有人不喜欢这个车，但是我们没有讨论过要另找一辆车的事情”

– Regarding the “surprise” for tier 5 anniversary (likely BT-7A): “Yep, it’s a nice vehicle, it has its specifics but many will like it.”
关于五周年的“惊喜”（很有可能是发BT-7A给大家）：“没错，这是个好车，他有着自己的特色，但是很多人会喜欢的。”