【Developer Q&A 】2014/05/06

Source:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/06/6-5-2014/
来源↗

A quick announcement: tomorrow, I will not be posting any articles, as I am gone whole day. I’ll post the translations when I get back (no idea when, probably very late – if there is anything to translate that is)
先说个事:明天没有新文章,因为我一天都要出门。我会在回家后再发翻译的东西的(不知道什么时候,应该会非常晚—当然了,还是首先要有能够翻译的东西才行。) 

– Storm confirms that Tiger 1 will definitely be nerfed
Storm肯定说虎式绝对会被砍

– the 9.0 tank size changes (SS: HD Panther got kinda bigger) did not influence their camo factor
9.0坦克尺寸的改动(SS:高清的豹式坦克(国服称黑豹坦克)变大了)并不影响它们的伪装系数

– Storm confirms that tanks will definitely have a special set of “historical” characteristics for historical battles only
Storm肯定说所有坦克都会有一组分开的“史实”数据,专门拿来给历史战用

– Storm states that the armor of the commander’s copula of Tiger II is correct because there are conflicting sources about this
Storm表示说虎王等等车长观察塔的装甲数据是正确的,因为关于这事有一些互相冲突的资料

– Svirin’s data on 85mm Ferdinand superstructure side armor thickness are incorrect (SS: it’s 80mm)
Svirin的关于费迪南战斗室侧面装甲有85mm厚的数据是不正确的(SS:是80mm啦)

– the split of various vehicles (SS: as in Panzer IV, StuG) was needed for historical battles, it does not mean that “less historical” tanks will be removed
许多车被分家(SS:栗如四号,三突)的原因是为了搞历史战,这并不意味着部分“不是很史实”的车会被移除 

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注